NO TO THE "SAVE THE CHILDREN" AND "UNICEF CAMPAIGNS". "Save de Children" and "Unicef" are two Organizations whose mission is to wash the faces of the most powerful, pressuring groups of the world. They try to divert our attention towards secondary matters. Their campaigns against anti-personnel mines and against the recruitment of child soldiers are but a form of justification for the existence of another type of armament and the existence of armies (even if they are formed by those over 18 years of age). Why don't they form campaigns against ALL TYPES OF ARMAMENTS
and against the very existence of ALL WARS and ALL ARMIES. Firearms are not bad because they can kill a child who is playing with them, they are bad in and of themselves, all of them. Armies are not bad because they can recruit children, they are bad in and of themselves, no matter how old its soldiers are. They try to manipulate us. The same is true with their campaigns against child labor. Why don't they create campaigns against all types of labor exploitation, no matter what the age is? For these organizations it is of no importance if the parents are being exploited, they must only protect, hypocritically, the children. If they want to help the children, let them start by not exploiting their parents. Their argument is: "we must avoid the exploitation of children by adults". My argument is: "we must avoid the exploitation of all human beings by the large corporations that steal our resources. If you don't exploit the parents, then the children will not be exploited. There is no need to protect children from exploitation, but rather all human beings, regardless of their age. To give dignity to the parents is to give dignity to the children". Is this so difficult to understand?

NO TO SENDING MULTI-NATIONAL ONU TROOPS. Another lie. They tell us that they send them to save those "poor people", to mediate as enforcers of the peace, to bring humanitarian aide... It is all lies. They send them as true occupational forces when the war develops, that they themselves have created, and starts to slip out of their grasp, or they simply want to put an end to something which they no longer wish to maintain.

NO TO THE ORGANIZATIONS OF "HUMANITARIAN AID". The Organizations that call themselves of "Humanitarian Aid" (World Doctors, Doctors without Frontiers...) show up at wars to put an aspirin (an expired one, at that) on wounds caused by arms sold by their own countries. First I'll shoot you and then I'll send a doctor to cure you. It is pure hypocrisy. The Western nations are the ones that generate, finance and maintain wars. Wars are no longer declared by governments, but rather by the interests of the great multinational corporations. The same exact thing is taking place with the other Organizations that "help the Third World". Solidarity does not consist in sending a couple of thousand dollars, or old technology, but rather by stopping the exploitation of the natural resources of these countries, in stopping the systematic removal of all of its assets. We need to talk about justice, not aid. These Organizations are only putting on patches, and in this manner find the justification necessary to maintain the situation, without demanding profound and global changes.

AM I TOO MUCH OF AN EXTREMIST BECAUSE I THINK THIS WAY? WHAT DO YOU THINK? ARE YOU TOO INFLUENCED BY TV NEWS REPORTS? THE GREAT INFORMATIVE NETWORKS, PROPERTY OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS, PROVIDE US WITH THE NEWS BY MANIPULATING PUBLIC OPINION IN WHATEVER MANNER BEST SUITS THEIR INTERESTS. ALWAYS POWER HAS JUSTIFIED THE EXISTENCE OF ARMIES BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES IT DEFENDS, DEFENDS THEIR INTERESTS, NOT MINE. IF IT DEFENDS THEIR INTERESTS , LET THEM SEND THEIR SONS.I AM NOT PLANNING ON GOING. I PROCLAIM MYSELF, AS OF RIGHT NOW, INSUBORDINATE, LET THEM NOT COUNT ON ME.

INDEX PAGE

</body> </html>