The first chapter of the textbook, I was told, correctly describes man/boy relationships in some historical and anthropological societies. A dozen or more older sexology textbooks in the United States incorrectly describe these same practices as "homosexual" and/or part of "gay" history. I have not yet seen these pages in the new textbook.
Chapter 14 is entitled "Varieties of Sexual Expression." I call attention to a paragraph on page 554, which I reproduce below. I interjected all material in [brackets]; none of the material in [brackets] below is found in this textbook:
start quote: "A number of small organizations in Western countries, usually made up of pedophiles and ephebephiles, argue that man-boy love should be legalized, usually under the pretense of guarding "the sexual rights of children and adolescents" (Okami, 1990)."
"In America, the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) argues for the abolition of age of consent laws. NAMBLA argues that there is a difference between those who simply want to use children for sexual release and those who develop long lasting, often exclusive, and even loving relationships with a single boy."
["use children for sexual release", "long lasting, often exclusive", "a single boy"? Wait a minute! News to me. No where does NAMBLA use such formulations in its position papers and its periodic publications.]
"Suppe (1984) agrees that pederasty among postpubescent boys need not necessarily be harmful [...] (which is not to deny that it often may be). On the other hand, those who work with sexually abused children vehemently deny the claim, pointing to children whose lives were ruined by sex with adults."
Personal Voices 14.4 tells the story of one pedophiliac, a physician, who established emotional and intimate relationships with young boys before being caught and sentenced to a prison term.