Michael Ingram - Revision history

The Admins at 10:51, 21 May 2023

2023-05-21T10:51:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 21 May 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	__NOTOC__'''Father Michael Ingram, O.P.''', (ca. 1932–2000) was a Catholic priest and child [[psychology\|psychologist]], who carried out an important study of a sample of 92 sexual contacts between men and boys.<ref> M. Ingram, A study of 92 cases of sexual contact between adult and child', British Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol 6, No.44,January 1979, p, 22f(Part 1), and Vol 6, No.45, February 1979, p. 24f (Part 2).</ref> He was also briefly embroiled in controversies involving [[Paedophile Information Exchange\|PIE]] in 1977.		{{Template:Ac}}__NOTOC__'''Father Michael Ingram, O.P.''', (ca. 1932–2000) was a Catholic priest and child [[psychology\|psychologist]], who carried out an important study of a sample of 92 sexual contacts between men and boys.<ref> M. Ingram, A study of 92 cases of sexual contact between adult and child', British Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol 6, No.44,January 1979, p, 22f(Part 1), and Vol 6, No.45, February 1979, p. 24f (Part 2).</ref> He was also briefly embroiled in controversies involving [[Paedophile Information Exchange\|PIE]] in 1977.

	==Views about pedophilia==		==Views about pedophilia==

The Admins at 16:33, 19 February 2023

2023-02-19T16:33:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 19 February 2023
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Involvement in PIE controversy==		==Involvement in PIE controversy==

	For the most part, 1977 was the year that the ~~[[National Profile: Britain\|~~British]] public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London. They had intended to present Ingram as a 'mystery' guest speaker, but he had been prevented from attending by his church superiors, and so [[Thomas O'Carroll\|Tom O'Carroll]] read out his speech instead. The meeting was notable for the hysterical lynch mob atmosphere surrounding it, with furious and violent reactions shown to those trying to enter and leave by the crowd assembled outside.		For the most part, 1977 was the year that the British public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London. They had intended to present Ingram as a 'mystery' guest speaker, but he had been prevented from attending by his church superiors, and so [[Thomas O'Carroll\|Tom O'Carroll]] read out his speech instead. The meeting was notable for the hysterical lynch mob atmosphere surrounding it, with furious and violent reactions shown to those trying to enter and leave by the crowd assembled outside.

	== Trial and Death ==		== Trial and Death ==

The Admins at 01:03, 11 May 2022

2022-05-11T01:03:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 11 May 2022
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Involvement in PIE controversy==		==Involvement in PIE controversy==

	For the most part, 1977 was the year that the [[National Profile: Britain\|British]] public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London. They had intended to present Ingram as a 'mystery' guest speaker, but he had been prevented from attending by his church superiors, and so [[Tom O'Carroll]] read out his speech instead. The meeting was notable for the hysterical lynch mob atmosphere surrounding it, with furious and violent reactions shown to those trying to enter and leave by the crowd assembled outside.		For the most part, 1977 was the year that the [[National Profile: Britain\|British]] public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London. They had intended to present Ingram as a 'mystery' guest speaker, but he had been prevented from attending by his church superiors, and so [[Thomas O'Carroll\|Tom O'Carroll]] read out his speech instead. The meeting was notable for the hysterical lynch mob atmosphere surrounding it, with furious and violent reactions shown to those trying to enter and leave by the crowd assembled outside.

	== Trial and Death ==		== Trial and Death ==

Stephen James: /* Trial and Death */

2009-07-08T12:48:00Z

Trial and Death

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 8 July 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== Trial and Death ==		== Trial and Death ==
	In 2000, Ingram, then 68 years old and living in Cambridge, was accused ~~to have~~ molested boys in the 1970s,<ref>Birmingham Post, Aug 1, 2000, “Michael Ingram (68) denied four charges of indecent assault, two of gross indecency and one of serious sexual assault from 1970 to 1978 against boys . . .” (via Google)</ref> when he was a parish priest in Leicester's Holy Cross Priory Church and active helping disadvantaged children.<ref> As reported in [http://www.adoption-net.co.uk/news/2000/aug/000817robbed.htm] and [http://www.adoption-net.co.uk/news/2000/aug/000817betray.htm] (from Google cache as of April 2009)</ref> He died August 26 in Leicester Prison,<ref>Birmingham Evening Mail, Aug 28, 2000, “Michael Ingram (68) originally from Cambridgeshire, died in the health care centre of Leicester Prison on Saturday night.” (via Google)</ref> after having been convicted at Leicester Crown Court two weeks earlier.<ref>The Mirror, Aug 15, 2000 “. . . convicted at Leicester of assaulting boys up to 30 years ago” (via Google)</ref> Prior to his Trial he had suffered severe injuries when driving his car into a wall.<ref>Daily Record, Aug 15, 2000 “But Roman Catholic Father Michael Ingram was in intensive care as the jury returned their verdicts, after driving his car into a wall at high speed.” (via Google)</ref>		In 2000, Ingram, then 68 years old and living in Cambridge, was accused of having molested boys in the 1970s,<ref>Birmingham Post, Aug 1, 2000, “Michael Ingram (68) denied four charges of indecent assault, two of gross indecency and one of serious sexual assault from 1970 to 1978 against boys . . .” (via Google)</ref> when he was a parish priest in Leicester's Holy Cross Priory Church and active helping disadvantaged children.<ref> As reported in [http://www.adoption-net.co.uk/news/2000/aug/000817robbed.htm] and [http://www.adoption-net.co.uk/news/2000/aug/000817betray.htm] (from Google cache as of April 2009)</ref> He died August 26 in Leicester Prison,<ref>Birmingham Evening Mail, Aug 28, 2000, “Michael Ingram (68) originally from Cambridgeshire, died in the health care centre of Leicester Prison on Saturday night.” (via Google)</ref> after having been convicted at Leicester Crown Court two weeks earlier.<ref>The Mirror, Aug 15, 2000 “. . . convicted at Leicester of assaulting boys up to 30 years ago” (via Google)</ref> Prior to his Trial he had suffered severe injuries when driving his car into a wall.<ref>Daily Record, Aug 15, 2000 “But Roman Catholic Father Michael Ingram was in intensive care as the jury returned their verdicts, after driving his car into a wall at high speed.” (via Google)</ref>

	==References==		==References==

Ahzee: Trial and death

2009-07-07T21:19:35Z

Trial and death

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 7 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	__NOTOC__'''Michael Ingram''', a Catholic priest and child [[psychology\|psychologist]], carried out an important study of a sample of 92 sexual contacts between men and boys.<ref> M. Ingram, A study of 92 cases of sexual contact between adult and child', British Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol 6, No.44,January 1979, p, 22f(Part 1), and Vol 6, No.45, February 1979, p. 24f (Part 2).</ref> He was also briefly embroiled in controversies involving [[Paedophile Information Exchange\|PIE]] in 1977.		__NOTOC__'''Father Michael Ingram, O.P.''', (ca. 1932–2000) was a Catholic priest and child [[psychology\|psychologist]], who carried out an important study of a sample of 92 sexual contacts between men and boys.<ref> M. Ingram, A study of 92 cases of sexual contact between adult and child', British Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol 6, No.44,January 1979, p, 22f(Part 1), and Vol 6, No.45, February 1979, p. 24f (Part 2).</ref> He was also briefly embroiled in controversies involving [[Paedophile Information Exchange\|PIE]] in 1977.

	==Views about pedophilia==		==Views about pedophilia==
Line 8:		Line 8:

	For the most part, 1977 was the year that the [[National Profile: Britain\|British]] public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London. They had intended to present Ingram as a 'mystery' guest speaker, but he had been prevented from attending by his church superiors, and so [[Tom O'Carroll]] read out his speech instead. The meeting was notable for the hysterical lynch mob atmosphere surrounding it, with furious and violent reactions shown to those trying to enter and leave by the crowd assembled outside.		For the most part, 1977 was the year that the [[National Profile: Britain\|British]] public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London. They had intended to present Ingram as a 'mystery' guest speaker, but he had been prevented from attending by his church superiors, and so [[Tom O'Carroll]] read out his speech instead. The meeting was notable for the hysterical lynch mob atmosphere surrounding it, with furious and violent reactions shown to those trying to enter and leave by the crowd assembled outside.

			== Trial and Death ==
			In 2000, Ingram, then 68 years old and living in Cambridge, was accused to have molested boys in the 1970s,<ref>Birmingham Post, Aug 1, 2000, “Michael Ingram (68) denied four charges of indecent assault, two of gross indecency and one of serious sexual assault from 1970 to 1978 against boys . . .” (via Google)</ref> when he was a parish priest in Leicester's Holy Cross Priory Church and active helping disadvantaged children.<ref> As reported in [http://www.adoption-net.co.uk/news/2000/aug/000817robbed.htm] and [http://www.adoption-net.co.uk/news/2000/aug/000817betray.htm] (from Google cache as of April 2009)</ref> He died August 26 in Leicester Prison,<ref>Birmingham Evening Mail, Aug 28, 2000, “Michael Ingram (68) originally from Cambridgeshire, died in the health care centre of Leicester Prison on Saturday night.” (via Google)</ref> after having been convicted at Leicester Crown Court two weeks earlier.<ref>The Mirror, Aug 15, 2000 “. . . convicted at Leicester of assaulting boys up to 30 years ago” (via Google)</ref> Prior to his Trial he had suffered severe injuries when driving his car into a wall.<ref>Daily Record, Aug 15, 2000 “But Roman Catholic Father Michael Ingram was in intensive care as the jury returned their verdicts, after driving his car into a wall at high speed.” (via Google)</ref>

	==References==		==References==

The Admins: wikilinks, remove table of ontents

2009-07-05T22:32:26Z

wikilinks, remove table of ontents

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 5 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Michael Ingram''', a Catholic priest and child psychologist, carried out an important study of a sample of 92 sexual contacts between men and boys.<ref> M. Ingram, A study of 92 cases of sexual contact between adult and child', British Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol 6, No.44,January 1979, p, 22f(Part 1), and Vol 6, No.45, February 1979, p. 24f (Part 2).</ref> He was also briefly embroiled in controversies involving PIE in 1977.		__NOTOC__'''Michael Ingram''', a Catholic priest and child [[psychology\|psychologist]], carried out an important study of a sample of 92 sexual contacts between men and boys.<ref> M. Ingram, A study of 92 cases of sexual contact between adult and child', British Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol 6, No.44,January 1979, p, 22f(Part 1), and Vol 6, No.45, February 1979, p. 24f (Part 2).</ref> He was also briefly embroiled in controversies involving [[Paedophile Information Exchange\|PIE]] in 1977.

	==Views about pedophilia==		==Views about pedophilia==

	While he did not defend pedophilia ''per se'', Ingram believed, on the basis of his experience and empirical studies, that ~~children~~ could benefit from the physical affection often shown in these relationships. He also believed that if and when they came to light, the processes of investigation and interrogation could often be more damaging to the child than the sexual contact itself. In general, Ingram was highly critical of those who appeared to think that sexual 'sins' were the only sins worth being concerned about.		While he did not defend [[pedophilia]] ''per se'', Ingram believed, on the basis of his experience and empirical studies, that [[child]]ren could benefit from the physical affection often shown in these relationships. He also believed that if and when they came to light, the processes of investigation and interrogation could often be more damaging to the child than the sexual contact itself. In general, Ingram was highly critical of those who appeared to think that sexual '[[sin\|sins]]' were the only sins worth being concerned about.

	==Involvement in PIE controversy==		==Involvement in PIE controversy==

	For the most part, 1977 was the year that the British public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London. They had intended to present Ingram as a 'mystery' guest speaker, but he had been prevented from attending by his church superiors, and so Tom O'Carroll read out his speech instead. The meeting was notable for the hysterical lynch mob atmosphere surrounding it, with furious and violent reactions shown to those trying to enter and leave by the crowd assembled outside.		For the most part, 1977 was the year that the [[National Profile: Britain\|British]] public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London. They had intended to present Ingram as a 'mystery' guest speaker, but he had been prevented from attending by his church superiors, and so [[Tom O'Carroll]] read out his speech instead. The meeting was notable for the hysterical lynch mob atmosphere surrounding it, with furious and violent reactions shown to those trying to enter and leave by the crowd assembled outside.

	==References==		==References==
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[http://www.ipce.info/host/radicase/preface.htm ''Paedophilia: The Radical Case'']		[http://www.ipce.info/host/radicase/preface.htm ''Paedophilia: The Radical Case'']
	(Most of this article is based on O'Carroll's account.)		(Most of this article is based on O'Carroll's account.)



	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:People: Sympathetic Activists]][[Category:People: British]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:People: Sympathetic Activists]][[Category:People: British]]

Stephen James at 15:33, 5 July 2009

2009-07-05T15:33:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 5 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Views about pedophilia==		==Views about pedophilia==

	While he did not defend pedophilia ''per se'', Ingram believed, on the basis of his experience and empirical studies, that children could benefit from the physical affection often shown in these relationships. He also believed that if and when they came to light, the processes of investigation and interrogation could often be more damaging to the child than the sexual contact itself. In general,Ingram was highly critical of those who appeared to think that sexual 'sins' were the only sins worth being concerned about.		While he did not defend pedophilia ''per se'', Ingram believed, on the basis of his experience and empirical studies, that children could benefit from the physical affection often shown in these relationships. He also believed that if and when they came to light, the processes of investigation and interrogation could often be more damaging to the child than the sexual contact itself. In general, Ingram was highly critical of those who appeared to think that sexual 'sins' were the only sins worth being concerned about.

	==Involvement in PIE controversy==		==Involvement in PIE controversy==
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==External link==		==External link==

	[http://www.ipce.info/host/radicase/preface.htm ''Paedophilia: The Radical Case'']		[http://www.ipce.info/host/radicase/preface.htm ''Paedophilia: The Radical Case'']
	(Most of this article is based on O'Carroll's account.)		(Most of this article is based on O'Carroll's account.)

Stephen James: /* Views about pedophilia */

2009-07-05T15:32:21Z

Views about pedophilia

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 5 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Views about pedophilia==		==Views about pedophilia==

	While he did not defend pedophilia ''per se'', Ingram believed, on the basis of his experience and empirical studies, that children could benefit from the physical affection often shown in these relationships. He also believed that if and when they came to light, the processes of investigation and interrogation could often be more damaging to the child than the sexual contact itself.		While he did not defend pedophilia ''per se'', Ingram believed, on the basis of his experience and empirical studies, that children could benefit from the physical affection often shown in these relationships. He also believed that if and when they came to light, the processes of investigation and interrogation could often be more damaging to the child than the sexual contact itself. In general,Ingram was highly critical of those who appeared to think that sexual 'sins' were the only sins worth being concerned about.

	==Involvement in PIE controversy==		==Involvement in PIE controversy==

Stephen James at 15:29, 5 July 2009

2009-07-05T15:29:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 5 July 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:

	==External link==		==External link==

			[http://www.ipce.info/host/radicase/preface.htm ''Paedophilia: The Radical Case'']
			(Most of this article is based on O'Carroll's account.)



	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:People: Sympathetic Activists]][[Category:People: British]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:People: Sympathetic Activists]][[Category:People: British]]

Stephen James at 15:26, 5 July 2009

2009-07-05T15:26:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 5 July 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Involvement in PIE controversy==		==Involvement in PIE controversy==

	1977 was the year that the British public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London.		For the most part, 1977 was the year that the British public became aware of PIE through several reports in national papers. While these were mostly hostile, a few were more balanced and these included discussions of the views of Michael Ingram as briefly outlined above. In September of that year, PIE held a public meeting at Conway Hall, London. They had intended to present Ingram as a 'mystery' guest speaker, but he had been prevented from attending by his church superiors, and so Tom O'Carroll read out his speech instead. The meeting was notable for the hysterical lynch mob atmosphere surrounding it, with furious and violent reactions shown to those trying to enter and leave by the crowd assembled outside.

	==References==		==References==

	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

			==External link==



	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:People: Sympathetic Activists]][[Category:People: British]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:People: Sympathetic Activists]][[Category:People: British]]