Minimodels injustice - Revision history

The Admins at 12:03, 21 April 2023

2023-04-21T12:03:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:03, 21 April 2023
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:''When I was released in October 2008, the photo trial judge began the process of sending me back to jail to serve yet another unjust sentence, this one of 2 years and 8 months. My current lawyer is trying to undo all these errors, but I’m not exactly optimistic. I may only have a few weeks left in freedom and I am trying to raise money to pay my lawyer. For this phase I need to pay him $800 (US) in March and another $800 (US) in April, funds which I don’t have, as I have no income."		:''When I was released in October 2008, the photo trial judge began the process of sending me back to jail to serve yet another unjust sentence, this one of 2 years and 8 months. My current lawyer is trying to undo all these errors, but I’m not exactly optimistic. I may only have a few weeks left in freedom and I am trying to raise money to pay my lawyer. For this phase I need to pay him $800 (US) in March and another $800 (US) in April, funds which I don’t have, as I have no income."

	:''[.. Favourable prosecution testimony omitted ..]''		:[.. Favourable prosecution testimony omitted ..]

	:''[Editor note]Upon further questioning from us, Lawrence Allen Stanley explained: “Yes. Technically the law is this: the [[Age of Consent]] is 18, technically. But age of consent is variable. Between the ages of 14 and 18 one must prove actual violence or grave threat in order to convict someone of a sexual act. Actual violence or grave threat is not hard to prove. All the girl has to say is that she didn't want the sex. However, if she says she didn't object to the sex, no crime is committed.''		:''[Editor note]Upon further questioning from us, Lawrence Allen Stanley explained: “Yes. Technically the law is this: the [[Age of Consent]] is 18, technically. But age of consent is variable. Between the ages of 14 and 18 one must prove actual violence or grave threat in order to convict someone of a sexual act. Actual violence or grave threat is not hard to prove. All the girl has to say is that she didn't want the sex. However, if she says she didn't object to the sex, no crime is committed.''

The Admins at 14:16, 15 March 2023

2023-03-15T14:16:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 15 March 2023
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:''[.. Favourable prosecution testimony omitted ..]''		:''[.. Favourable prosecution testimony omitted ..]''

	:''[Editor note]Upon further questioning from us, Lawrence Allen Stanley explained: “Yes. Technically the law is this: the ~~age~~ of ~~consent~~ is 18, technically. But age of consent is variable. Between the ages of 14 and 18 one must prove actual violence or grave threat in order to convict someone of a sexual act. Actual violence or grave threat is not hard to prove. All the girl has to say is that she didn't want the sex. However, if she says she didn't object to the sex, no crime is committed.''		:''[Editor note]Upon further questioning from us, Lawrence Allen Stanley explained: “Yes. Technically the law is this: the [[Age of Consent]] is 18, technically. But age of consent is variable. Between the ages of 14 and 18 one must prove actual violence or grave threat in order to convict someone of a sexual act. Actual violence or grave threat is not hard to prove. All the girl has to say is that she didn't want the sex. However, if she says she didn't object to the sex, no crime is committed.''

	:''“If the girl is under 14, no crime is committed if (a) the girl is physically developed and appears to have ~~consented~~ (i.e., said there was no violence or threat), or (b) if the girl is a prostitute or otherwise very experienced sexually.''		:''“If the girl is under 14, no crime is committed if (a) the girl is physically developed and appears to have [[consent]]ed (i.e., said there was no violence or threat), or (b) if the girl is a prostitute or otherwise very experienced sexually.''

	:''“So, as the prosecution shows by citing jurisprudence, including from the judge who affirmed my conviction (!), even if the oral sex occurred, the law does not apply.”''		:''“So, as the prosecution shows by citing jurisprudence, including from the judge who affirmed my conviction (!), even if the oral sex occurred, the law does not apply.”''

The Admins at 11:21, 16 October 2021

2021-10-16T11:21:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 16 October 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]		[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]
	'''Minimodels injustice''' ~~refers~~ to a major~~, unfolding~~ injustice perpetuated by the [[Brazil]]ian authorities in which a [[Lawrence A. Stanley]] was ~~convicted~~ for producing images of [[Child Pornography\|child pornography]] (in reality, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.		'''Minimodels injustice''' referred to a major injustice perpetuated by the [[Brazil]]ian authorities in which a [[Lawrence A. Stanley]] was prosecuted for producing images of [[Child Pornography\|child pornography]] (in reality, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.

	Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on ~~[http://inquisition21~~.com~~/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]~~:		Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on '''Inquisition21.com''' (no longer available):

	:''"I was arrested on June 8, 2002 under the theory that my photo site, Minimodels was a hub of international child pornography. I was even on the cover of a national magazine owned by Globo, the main television station. Several weeks later the police investigator admitted in the local newspaper that there were no nude images, but as she saw it, non-nude images were child pornography too, even if the law didn’t yet define it as such. On August 13, 2002, I was released under a writ of habeas corpus by the Brazilian Supreme Court, which noted that the images in the case did not appear to fit the definition of child pornography. (Editor. He sent a number of images for our inspection. Only two are shown with this story but the others sent were largely similar and none were nude.)''		:''"I was arrested on June 8, 2002 under the theory that my photo site, Minimodels was a hub of international child pornography. I was even on the cover of a national magazine owned by Globo, the main television station. Several weeks later the police investigator admitted in the local newspaper that there were no nude images, but as she saw it, non-nude images were child pornography too, even if the law didn’t yet define it as such. On August 13, 2002, I was released under a writ of habeas corpus by the Brazilian Supreme Court, which noted that the images in the case did not appear to fit the definition of child pornography. (Editor. He sent a number of images for our inspection. Only two are shown with this story but the others sent were largely similar and none were nude.)''
Line 29:		Line 29:

	:''Another note: “A Brazilian affiliate of Save the Children, CEDECA, was called in by the sentencing judge. I only know they offered a ‘free’ lawyer to the girl, but her family already had a family lawyer. The judge did her best to intimidate the girl's aunt and the girl (including screaming at both). In the sentence she notes that it was very ‘suspicious’ that they refused a ‘free’ lawyer. (Note, too, that my lawyer at the time was incompetent and did nothing that might prejudice his future practice in front of this judge.)''"		:''Another note: “A Brazilian affiliate of Save the Children, CEDECA, was called in by the sentencing judge. I only know they offered a ‘free’ lawyer to the girl, but her family already had a family lawyer. The judge did her best to intimidate the girl's aunt and the girl (including screaming at both). In the sentence she notes that it was very ‘suspicious’ that they refused a ‘free’ lawyer. (Note, too, that my lawyer at the time was incompetent and did nothing that might prejudice his future practice in front of this judge.)''"

	~~==External link==~~
	*[http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 Full story] site has been down for years [http://web.archive.org/web/20090211152759/http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 here is an archive from February 11, 2009]

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]]

	[[Category:Art]]		[[Category:Art]]
	[[Category:Censorship]]		[[Category:Censorship]]

Tyciol: /* External link */

2013-05-17T21:15:25Z

External link

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 17 May 2013
Line 31:		Line 31:

	==External link==		==External link==
			*[http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 Full story] site has been down for years [http://web.archive.org/web/20090211152759/http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 here is an archive from February 11, 2009]

	*[~~http~~:~~//inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 Full story~~]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]]

	[[Category:~~Official Encyclopedia~~]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Child Pornography]][[Category:~~Hysteria~~]][[Category:~~Art]][[Category~~:~~Law/Crime~~]][[Category:~~Law/Crime~~: Brazilian]][[Category:History & Events: ~~Real Crime~~]][[Category:History & Events]][[Category:~~History & Events: Personal Scandals~~]][[Category:~~History & Events: Brazilian~~]][[Category:~~History & Events~~: ~~2000s~~]]		[[Category:Art]]
			[[Category:Censorship]]
			[[Category:Child Pornography]]
			[[Category:History & Events]]
			[[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]
			[[Category:History & Events: Brazilian]]
			[[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]]
			[[Category:History & Events: Real Crime]]
			[[Category:Hysteria]]
			[[Category:Law/Crime]]
			[[Category:Law/Crime: Brazilian]]

Tyciol: holy shit, I can edit again without the wiki crashing like fuck, amazing

2013-05-17T19:24:30Z

holy shit, I can edit again without the wiki crashing like fuck, amazing

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 17 May 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the [[Brazil]]ian authorities in which a [[Lawrence A. Stanley]] was convicted for producing images of [[Child Pornography\|child pornography]] (in ~~relaity~~, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.		[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]
			'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the [[Brazil]]ian authorities in which a [[Lawrence A. Stanley]] was convicted for producing images of [[Child Pornography\|child pornography]] (in reality, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.

	Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]:		Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]:

The Admins at 00:25, 4 May 2009

2009-05-04T00:25:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 4 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the [[Brazil]]ian authorities in which a [[Lawrence A. Stanley]] was convicted for producing images of [[child pornography]] (in relaity, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.		[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the [[Brazil]]ian authorities in which a [[Lawrence A. Stanley]] was convicted for producing images of [[Child Pornography\|child pornography]] (in relaity, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.

	Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]:		Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]:

The Admins: /* External link */

2009-01-31T15:22:07Z

External link

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 31 January 2009
Line 33:		Line 33:
	*[http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 Full story]		*[http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 Full story]

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Child Pornography]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Art]][[Category:Law/Crime]][[Category:Law/Crime: Brazilian]][[Category:History & Events: Real Crime]][[Category:History & Events]][[Category:History & Events: Brazilian]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Child Pornography]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Art]][[Category:Law/Crime]][[Category:Law/Crime: Brazilian]][[Category:History & Events: Real Crime]][[Category:History & Events]][[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]][[Category:History & Events: Brazilian]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]

The Admins at 15:12, 31 January 2009

2009-01-31T15:12:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 31 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the [[Brazil]]ian authorities in which a ~~man~~ was convicted for producing images of [[child pornography]] (in relaity, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.		[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the [[Brazil]]ian authorities in which a [[Lawrence A. Stanley]] was convicted for producing images of [[child pornography]] (in relaity, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.

	Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]:		Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]:

Rez at 00:26, 11 January 2009

2009-01-11T00:26:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:26, 11 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the ~~Brazilian~~ authorities in which a man was convicted for producing images of [[child pornography]] (in relaity, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.		[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the [[Brazil]]ian authorities in which a man was convicted for producing images of [[child pornography]] (in relaity, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.

	Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]:		Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]:

Rez at 00:25, 11 January 2009

2009-01-11T00:25:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 11 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the Brazilian authorities in which a man was convicted for producing images of [[child pornography]] (in relaity, clothed fashion shoots) and ~~was~~ framed for other dubious crimes that he did not ~~committ~~. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion ~~that maintained~~ that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.		[[Image:Childporn.jpg\|frame\|Deemed by Brazilian authorities to be pornographic]]'''Minimodels injustice''' refers to a major, unfolding injustice perpetuated by the Brazilian authorities in which a man was convicted for producing images of [[child pornography]] (in relaity, clothed fashion shoots) and framed for other dubious crimes that he did not commit. This was carried out in the face of a re-formulated prosecution opinion that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution.

	Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]:		Testimony comes in the form of a personal statement, published on [http://inquisition21.com/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=367 inquisition21.com]: