Pedosexuality - Revision history

The Admins at 23:31, 20 May 2023

2023-05-20T23:31:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 20 May 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	__NOTOC__'''Pedosexuality''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for strong physical-erotic attractions primary toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. A person experiencing these attractions is described as a pedosexual. It is intended to be analogous to terms such as [[homosexuality]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.		{{Template:MAI}}__NOTOC__'''Pedosexuality''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for strong physical-erotic attractions primary toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. A person experiencing these attractions is described as a pedosexual. It is intended to be analogous to terms such as [[homosexuality]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.

	The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are dependent upon whether or not [[minor-attracted community\|communities]] such as [[boylove]] and [[girllove]] actually practice usage as outlined.		The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are dependent upon whether or not [[minor-attracted community\|communities]] such as [[boylove]] and [[girllove]] actually practice usage as outlined.

The Admins at 01:38, 15 September 2021

2021-09-15T01:38:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, 15 September 2021
Line 15:		Line 15:
	There is an ongoing controversy within the [[boylove]]/[[girllove]] communities regarding the sexual vs. non-sexual nature of the two terms. Some identify themselves as non-sexual [[girllover]]s for example. Arguments against this allege that such people are mislabelling themselves or in denial.		There is an ongoing controversy within the [[boylove]]/[[girllove]] communities regarding the sexual vs. non-sexual nature of the two terms. Some identify themselves as non-sexual [[girllover]]s for example. Arguments against this allege that such people are mislabelling themselves or in denial.

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: ~~Childlove~~]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: MAP]]

The Admins: it's really a neologism

2021-09-13T16:20:16Z

it's really a neologism

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 13 September 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	__NOTOC__~~{{MAI}}~~'''Pedosexuality''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for strong physical-erotic attractions primary toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. A person experiencing these attractions is described as a pedosexual. It is intended to be analogous to terms such as [[homosexuality]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.		__NOTOC__'''Pedosexuality''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for strong physical-erotic attractions primary toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. A person experiencing these attractions is described as a pedosexual. It is intended to be analogous to terms such as [[homosexuality]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.

	The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are dependent upon whether or not [[minor-attracted community\|communities]] such as [[boylove]] and [[girllove]] actually practice usage as outlined.		The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are dependent upon whether or not [[minor-attracted community\|communities]] such as [[boylove]] and [[girllove]] actually practice usage as outlined.
Line 15:		Line 15:
	There is an ongoing controversy within the [[boylove]]/[[girllove]] communities regarding the sexual vs. non-sexual nature of the two terms. Some identify themselves as non-sexual [[girllover]]s for example. Arguments against this allege that such people are mislabelling themselves or in denial.		There is an ongoing controversy within the [[boylove]]/[[girllove]] communities regarding the sexual vs. non-sexual nature of the two terms. Some identify themselves as non-sexual [[girllover]]s for example. Arguments against this allege that such people are mislabelling themselves or in denial.

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia~~]] [[Category:Facts of life~~]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: Childlove]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: Childlove]]

The Admins at 09:01, 3 April 2009

2009-04-03T09:01:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:01, 3 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	__NOTOC__{{MAI}}'''~~Pedosexual~~''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for ~~persons whose~~ primary ~~sexual orientation is geared~~ toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. ~~Its definition can clearly~~ be ~~weighed similar~~ to ~~that of~~ [[~~homosexual~~]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.		__NOTOC__{{MAI}}'''Pedosexuality''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for strong physical-erotic attractions primary toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. A person experiencing these attractions is described as a pedosexual. It is intended to be analogous to terms such as [[homosexuality]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.

	The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are ~~entirely~~ dependent upon whether or not ~~the respective~~ communities actually practice usage as outlined. At present, the drive to introduce the word "pedosexual" into both communities has more of the air of a deliberate movement than an assessment of existing usage. As such, it must be understood that the below-listed hypothetical advantages are in fact a prescriptive "wish list" for the use of this term and do not represent a descriptive analysis of actual usage.		The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are dependent upon whether or not [[minor-attracted community\|communities]] such as [[boylove]] and [[girllove]] actually practice usage as outlined.

	A disadvantage of the proposed term would be that a large portion of [[~~Minor~~-~~Attracted Person~~]]s who are primarily attracted to [[adolescent]]s would be excluded from the group of people described as pedosexuals. This is the same problem that has caused some opposition to the term "~~childlover~~." [[Boylover]]s on the ~~Internet~~ for instance, are not a cohesive community in many respects but to a large degree they do not tend to separate themselves into communities of those attracted to [[prepubescent]] boys and those attracted to older boys. Coining a term that would magnify the difference between those subgroups could be seen as divisive and might have the potential to actually divide the communities if adopted.		A disadvantage of the proposed term would be that a large portion of [[minor-attracted person]]s who are primarily attracted to [[adolescent]]s would be excluded from the group of people described as pedosexuals. This is the same problem that has caused some opposition to the term "[[childlove]]r." [[Boylover]]s on the internet for instance, are not a cohesive community in many respects but to a large degree they do not tend to separate themselves into communities of those attracted to [[prepubescent]] boys and those attracted to older boys. Coining a term that would magnify the difference between those subgroups could be seen as divisive and might have the potential to actually divide the communities if adopted.

			The term could also be criticised on grounds of etymology. If the constituent term "''sexuality''" is seen as identifying a preference for one gender, both or the other, "''pedosexuality''" is an inaccurate term as it intends to identify a [[chronophilia]] (age-based attraction). Whilst other preferences, notably Zoophilia/Zoosexuality have been described as sexual preferences, this does not necessarily make the usage of this term correct.

	==Pedosexual vs. pedophile==		==Pedosexual vs. pedophile==

	The term [[pedophilia\|pedophile]] has existed for millennia. The recent issues with the term mainly center around its modern connotation. In the 19th century, it was ~~coined~~ into a term for a [[paraphilia]], that is, a clinical mental illness. This has allowed the ideal regarding the preference, and practice, to fall into further and further negative light. With the recent ~~turn into glamorization of severe cases of~~ [[child abuse]], [[rape]], and clear cases of [[Child Sexual Abuse\|molestation]], the term "pedophile" has become a media ~~coin-phrase to regard all type~~ of circumstances~~, whether or not they truly are pedophiliac in nature~~, and is felt to have cast permanent damage on the definition and connotation of the word.		The term [[pedophilia\|pedophile]] has existed for millennia. The recent issues with the term mainly center around its modern connotation. In the 19th century, it was adapted into a term for a [[paraphilia]], that is, a clinical mental illness. This has allowed the ideal regarding the preference, and practice, to fall into further and further negative light. With the recent upturn in publicity regarding [[child abuse]], [[rape]], and clear cases of [[Child Sexual Abuse\|molestation]], the term "pedophile" has become a media term, used in a variety of circumstances, and is felt to have cast permanent damage on the definition and connotation of the word.

	~~==Pedosexual vs. childlover/boylover/girllover==~~

	There is an ongoing controversy within the [[boylove]]/[[girllove]] communities regarding the sexual vs. non-sexual nature of the two forms of [[childlove]]. Some say that non-sexual forms of childlove are indeed possible. Arguments against that often claim that those who are non-sexual childlovers are "closeted" or "in denial".

	In essence, for one to label themselves as a "childlover", and what the term means, is purely up to that individual person. It also delves into that person's own sexual make-up. Distinction between the terms "pedosexual" and "childlover" may help to differentiate between the two beliefs commonly held.

	~~==Pedo''sexuality''==~~

	To be '''pedosexual''' does not necessarily mean that one acts upon their desires. It is not a legal definition casting light on the person's activities. Actually participating in sexual relations with [[minors]] can lead to criminal prosecution, prison, classification as a [[sex offender]], or in more extreme cases, death.

	~~==Possible criticism==~~

	If the constituent term "''sexuality''" is seen as identifying a preference for one gender, both or the other, "''pedosexuality''" is an inaccurate term as it intends to identify a [[chronophilia]] (age-based attraction). Whilst other preferences, notably Zoophilia/Zoosexuality have been described as sexual preferences, this does not necessarily make the usage of this term correct.

	~~==Prominent attitudes toward pedosexuality==~~

	Public opinions toward child sexuality and pedosexuality differ between societies. Generally speaking, Western cultures apply tighter constraints and heavier penalties than others do. In fact, in some cultures, both present and past, multi-generational sexual relations are not only tolerated, but openly accepted.

	~~==Support communities for pedosexuals==~~

	"No man is an island" goes the saying. As with any other aspect of humanity, sharing thoughts and feelings on pedosexuality is nothing new. Organizations such as [[NAMBLA]] and other early attempts at [[Public Activism\|organization]] and support for pedosexuals continue to thrive albeit the often negative reputation they have received among both the public and people within the pedosexual community itself. Pedosexuals who have found communities and organizations they identify with are usually more in tune and at ease with their situations. Most notably, the growth of the [[online community of childlovers]] in recent years have let pedosexuals develop positive conduits for releasing their frustrations, make positive common bonds, and strengthen their sense of community.

	==~~See also~~==		==Pedosexual vs. minor-attracted/childlover/boylover/girllover==

	*[[~~Minor-attracted person~~]]		There is an ongoing controversy within the [[boylove]]/[[girllove]] communities regarding the sexual vs. non-sexual nature of the two terms. Some identify themselves as non-sexual [[girllover]]s for example. Arguments against this allege that such people are mislabelling themselves or in denial.
	*[[~~Childlover~~]]
	*[[Boylover]]
	*[[~~Girllover~~]]

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]] [[Category:Facts of life]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: Childlove]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]] [[Category:Facts of life]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: Childlove]]

The Admins: Pedosexual moved to Pedosexuality

2009-04-03T08:23:28Z

Pedosexual moved to Pedosexuality

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 3 April 2009
(No difference)

The Admins at 16:37, 20 March 2009

2009-03-20T16:37:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 20 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Pedosexual''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for persons whose primary sexual orientation is geared toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. Its definition can clearly be weighed similar to that of [[homosexual]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.		__NOTOC__{{MAI}}'''Pedosexual''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for persons whose primary sexual orientation is geared toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. Its definition can clearly be weighed similar to that of [[homosexual]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.

	The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are entirely dependent upon whether or not the respective communities actually practice usage as outlined. At present, the drive to introduce the word "pedosexual" into both communities has more of the air of a deliberate movement than an assessment of existing usage. As such, it must be understood that the below-listed hypothetical advantages are in fact a prescriptive "wish list" for the use of this term and do not represent a descriptive analysis of actual usage.		The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are entirely dependent upon whether or not the respective communities actually practice usage as outlined. At present, the drive to introduce the word "pedosexual" into both communities has more of the air of a deliberate movement than an assessment of existing usage. As such, it must be understood that the below-listed hypothetical advantages are in fact a prescriptive "wish list" for the use of this term and do not represent a descriptive analysis of actual usage.

The Admins: I've seen non symp parties using it

2009-02-16T12:21:21Z

I've seen non symp parties using it

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:21, 16 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Pedosexual''' is a ~~neologism~~ intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for persons whose primary sexual orientation is geared toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. Its definition can clearly be weighed similar to that of [[homosexual]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.		'''Pedosexual''' is a relatively new term intended to be used as a non-biased, [[value-neutral]] term for persons whose primary sexual orientation is geared toward children, whether it be [[boy]]s or [[girl]]s. Its definition can clearly be weighed similar to that of [[homosexual]]. Homosexuals are seldom called "homophiles" today for instance. In a reversal of this alternative etymology, the activists of the [[Mattachine Society]] in the 1950s, probably the earliest modern homosexual rights organization, often referred to themselves as homophiles.

	The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are entirely dependent upon whether or not the respective communities actually practice usage as outlined. At present, the drive to introduce the word "pedosexual" into both communities has more of the air of a deliberate movement than an assessment of existing usage. As such, it must be understood that the below-listed hypothetical advantages are in fact a prescriptive "wish list" for the use of this term and do not represent a descriptive analysis of actual usage.		The proposed benefits which would arise from the use of this term are entirely dependent upon whether or not the respective communities actually practice usage as outlined. At present, the drive to introduce the word "pedosexual" into both communities has more of the air of a deliberate movement than an assessment of existing usage. As such, it must be understood that the below-listed hypothetical advantages are in fact a prescriptive "wish list" for the use of this term and do not represent a descriptive analysis of actual usage.

The Admins at 12:19, 16 February 2009

2009-02-16T12:19:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, 16 February 2009
Line 30:		Line 30:

	"No man is an island" goes the saying. As with any other aspect of humanity, sharing thoughts and feelings on pedosexuality is nothing new. Organizations such as [[NAMBLA]] and other early attempts at [[Public Activism\|organization]] and support for pedosexuals continue to thrive albeit the often negative reputation they have received among both the public and people within the pedosexual community itself. Pedosexuals who have found communities and organizations they identify with are usually more in tune and at ease with their situations. Most notably, the growth of the [[online community of childlovers]] in recent years have let pedosexuals develop positive conduits for releasing their frustrations, make positive common bonds, and strengthen their sense of community.		"No man is an island" goes the saying. As with any other aspect of humanity, sharing thoughts and feelings on pedosexuality is nothing new. Organizations such as [[NAMBLA]] and other early attempts at [[Public Activism\|organization]] and support for pedosexuals continue to thrive albeit the often negative reputation they have received among both the public and people within the pedosexual community itself. Pedosexuals who have found communities and organizations they identify with are usually more in tune and at ease with their situations. Most notably, the growth of the [[online community of childlovers]] in recent years have let pedosexuals develop positive conduits for releasing their frustrations, make positive common bonds, and strengthen their sense of community.

			==See also==

			*[[Minor-attracted person]]
			*[[Childlover]]
			*[[Boylover]]
			*[[Girllover]]

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]] [[Category:Facts of life]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: Childlove]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]] [[Category:Facts of life]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: Childlove]]

Rez: /* Support communities for pedosexuals */

2008-12-05T15:46:29Z

Support communities for pedosexuals

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 5 December 2008
Line 29:		Line 29:
	==Support communities for pedosexuals==		==Support communities for pedosexuals==

	"No man is an island" goes the saying. As with any other aspect of humanity, sharing thoughts and feelings on pedosexuality is nothing new. Organizations such as [[NAMBLA]] and other early attempts at [[Public Activism\|organization]] and support for pedosexuals continue to thrive albeit the often negative reputation they have received among both the public and people within the pedosexual community itself. Pedosexuals who have found communities and organizations they identify with are usually more in tune and at ease with their situations. Most notably, the growth of the [[online community of ~~Minor-attracted persons~~]] in recent years have let pedosexuals develop positive conduits for releasing their frustrations, make positive common bonds, and strengthen their sense of community.		"No man is an island" goes the saying. As with any other aspect of humanity, sharing thoughts and feelings on pedosexuality is nothing new. Organizations such as [[NAMBLA]] and other early attempts at [[Public Activism\|organization]] and support for pedosexuals continue to thrive albeit the often negative reputation they have received among both the public and people within the pedosexual community itself. Pedosexuals who have found communities and organizations they identify with are usually more in tune and at ease with their situations. Most notably, the growth of the [[online community of childlovers]] in recent years have let pedosexuals develop positive conduits for releasing their frustrations, make positive common bonds, and strengthen their sense of community.

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]] [[Category:Facts of life]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: Childlove]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]] [[Category:Facts of life]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Terminology: Childlove]]

Rez at 15:43, 5 December 2008

2008-12-05T15:43:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 5 December 2008
Line 18:		Line 18:

	To be '''pedosexual''' does not necessarily mean that one acts upon their desires. It is not a legal definition casting light on the person's activities. Actually participating in sexual relations with [[minors]] can lead to criminal prosecution, prison, classification as a [[sex offender]], or in more extreme cases, death.		To be '''pedosexual''' does not necessarily mean that one acts upon their desires. It is not a legal definition casting light on the person's activities. Actually participating in sexual relations with [[minors]] can lead to criminal prosecution, prison, classification as a [[sex offender]], or in more extreme cases, death.

			==Possible criticism==

			If the constituent term "''sexuality''" is seen as identifying a preference for one gender, both or the other, "''pedosexuality''" is an inaccurate term as it intends to identify a [[chronophilia]] (age-based attraction). Whilst other preferences, notably Zoophilia/Zoosexuality have been described as sexual preferences, this does not necessarily make the usage of this term correct.

	==Prominent attitudes toward pedosexuality==		==Prominent attitudes toward pedosexuality==