Richard Yuill - Revision history

Jim Burton at 19:27, 29 April 2026

2026-04-29T19:27:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 29 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:Ac}}<div style="margin-right: 25px; float: left; width: 250px">__TOC__</div>'''Dr Richard Yuill''', who was awarded his PhD in Sociology from Glasgow University in December 2004 is a [[~~Michel Foucault\|Foucauldian~~]] ~~researcher and critical analyst known for his~~ work on [[~~Queer Theory~~]] and [[Minor-adult sex\|Intergenerational Sex]]ualities.		{{Template:Ac}}<div style="margin-right: 25px; float: left; width: 250px">__TOC__</div>'''Dr Richard Yuill''', who was awarded his PhD in Sociology from Glasgow University in December 2004 is a historian and social researcher known for his [[Queer Theory]] work on [[Michel Foucault\|Foucault]] and [[Minor-adult sex\|Intergenerational Sex]]ualities.
	Yuill is not presently ~~working in this field~~.
			Yuill is not presently publishing as an academic.

	==PhD thesis==		==PhD thesis==

Thorn: /* Other major works */

2025-12-16T17:10:55Z

Other major works

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 16 December 2025
Line 42:		Line 42:
	Yuill has collaborated with [[Bruce Rind]], publishing a 2012 paper on the topic of [[Hebephilia]], within its historical and anthropological context. This followed academic controversy over the idea of Hebephilia as a form of pathology - something Yuill and Rind argue is ahistorical.		Yuill has collaborated with [[Bruce Rind]], publishing a 2012 paper on the topic of [[Hebephilia]], within its historical and anthropological context. This followed academic controversy over the idea of Hebephilia as a form of pathology - something Yuill and Rind argue is ahistorical.

	Yuill himself details his experience of facing researcher stigma and media attack in his 2010 scholarly article ''Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex''.<ref>[https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/interrogating-essential-moral-baselines-adult-child-sex Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex]</ref> He documents attacks on himself and past researchers most fully in a contribution to [[Censoring Sex Research]] (2013), with a book chapter titled ''Intergenerational Sexualities: A Case Study on the Colonization of Late Modern Sexual Subjects and Researcher Agendas''.<ref>[https://library.lol/main/20CD5808BA3977780E914855954E456F libgen: Censoring Sex Research]</ref> (See also his archived article ''A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities''<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20211206155119/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=~~A%20Critical%20Analysis%20of%20Subjectivist~~-~~Based%20Theorising%20and%20Research%20on%20Male%20Intergenerational%20Sexualities~~ A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities] by Richard Yuill (archived from williamapercy.com) </ref> which in part duplicate the book chapter).		Yuill himself details his experience of facing researcher stigma and media attack in his 2010 scholarly article ''Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex''.<ref>[https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/interrogating-essential-moral-baselines-adult-child-sex Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex]</ref> He documents attacks on himself and past researchers most fully in a contribution to [[Censoring Sex Research]] (2013), with a book chapter titled ''Intergenerational Sexualities: A Case Study on the Colonization of Late Modern Sexual Subjects and Researcher Agendas''.<ref>[https://library.lol/main/20CD5808BA3977780E914855954E456F libgen: Censoring Sex Research]</ref> (See also his archived article ''A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities''<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20211206155119/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=A_Critical_Analysis_of_Subjectivist-Based_Theorising_and_Research_on_Male_Intergenerational_Sexualities A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities] by Richard Yuill (archived from williamapercy.com) </ref> which in part duplicate the book chapter).

	The historian [[Rachel Hope Cleves]] summarizes Yuill's story in her award-winning 2020 book ''Unspeakable: A Life Beyond Sexual Morality'', examining once famous and influential pederast [[Norman Douglas]]. Cleves sees Yuill's case as an example of the potential risks of writing and publishing on intergenerational relations.		The historian [[Rachel Hope Cleves]] summarizes Yuill's story in her award-winning 2020 book ''Unspeakable: A Life Beyond Sexual Morality'', examining once famous and influential pederast [[Norman Douglas]]. Cleves sees Yuill's case as an example of the potential risks of writing and publishing on intergenerational relations.

Thorn: /* External links */

2025-07-31T16:32:06Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 31 July 2025
Line 62:		Line 62:

	==External links==		==External links==
			*[https://web.archive.org/web/20200928121216/http://williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Richard%20Yuill Richard Yuill] - William Percy
	*[https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/dec/02/research.children The Guardian] - Wrap-up of the controversy.		*[https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/dec/02/research.children The Guardian] - Wrap-up of the controversy.
	*[https://web.archive.org/web/20210613210913/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Abstract Yuill PhD Abstract]		*[https://web.archive.org/web/20210613210913/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Abstract Yuill PhD Abstract]

Thorn: /* External links */

2025-07-31T16:28:38Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 31 July 2025
Line 69:		Line 69:
	*[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=192834&sectioncode=26 Answering back] - Letter from Yuill to THE, see above for testimony if paywall active.		*[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=192834&sectioncode=26 Answering back] - Letter from Yuill to THE, see above for testimony if paywall active.
	*[https://www.ipce.info/imo-archive/bg_2004/Yuill_reactions.htm Yuill reactions] - Ipce summarizes some of the media fallout.		*[https://www.ipce.info/imo-archive/bg_2004/Yuill_reactions.htm Yuill reactions] - Ipce summarizes some of the media fallout.
			*[https://web.archive.org/web/20200812234251/http://williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Review Book Review] of Michael Matthew Kaylor's ''Secreted Desires—The Major [[Uranian Poetry\|Uranians]]: Hopkins, Pater and Wilde''

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category: Queer Theory]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Gay]][[Category:Sociological Theory]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Youth]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research on "Child Molesters"]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Broader Perspectives]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: British]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]][[Category:History & Events: British]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category: Queer Theory]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Gay]][[Category:Sociological Theory]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Youth]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research on "Child Molesters"]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Broader Perspectives]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: British]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]][[Category:History & Events: British]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]

Thorn: /* Other major works */

2025-07-31T16:20:47Z

Other major works

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 31 July 2025
Line 42:		Line 42:
	Yuill has collaborated with [[Bruce Rind]], publishing a 2012 paper on the topic of [[Hebephilia]], within its historical and anthropological context. This followed academic controversy over the idea of Hebephilia as a form of pathology - something Yuill and Rind argue is ahistorical.		Yuill has collaborated with [[Bruce Rind]], publishing a 2012 paper on the topic of [[Hebephilia]], within its historical and anthropological context. This followed academic controversy over the idea of Hebephilia as a form of pathology - something Yuill and Rind argue is ahistorical.

	Yuill himself details his experience of facing researcher stigma and media attack in his 2010 scholarly article ''Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex''.<ref>[https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/interrogating-essential-moral-baselines-adult-child-sex Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex]</ref> He documents attacks on himself and past researchers most fully in a contribution to [[Censoring Sex Research]] (2013), with a book chapter titled ''Intergenerational Sexualities: A Case Study on the Colonization of Late Modern Sexual Subjects and Researcher Agendas''.<ref>[https://library.lol/main/20CD5808BA3977780E914855954E456F libgen: Censoring Sex Research]</ref> (See also his archived article ''A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities''<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20211206155119/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=A%20Critical%20Analysis%20of%20Subjectivist-Based%20Theorising%20and%20Research%20on%20Male%20Intergenerational%20Sexualities A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities] by Richard Yuill (archived from williamapercy.com) </ref> which in part duplicate the book chapter)		Yuill himself details his experience of facing researcher stigma and media attack in his 2010 scholarly article ''Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex''.<ref>[https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/interrogating-essential-moral-baselines-adult-child-sex Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex]</ref> He documents attacks on himself and past researchers most fully in a contribution to [[Censoring Sex Research]] (2013), with a book chapter titled ''Intergenerational Sexualities: A Case Study on the Colonization of Late Modern Sexual Subjects and Researcher Agendas''.<ref>[https://library.lol/main/20CD5808BA3977780E914855954E456F libgen: Censoring Sex Research]</ref> (See also his archived article ''A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities''<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20211206155119/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=A%20Critical%20Analysis%20of%20Subjectivist-Based%20Theorising%20and%20Research%20on%20Male%20Intergenerational%20Sexualities A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities] by Richard Yuill (archived from williamapercy.com) </ref> which in part duplicate the book chapter).

	The historian [[Rachel Hope Cleves]] summarizes Yuill's story in her award-winning 2020 book ''Unspeakable: A Life Beyond Sexual Morality'', examining once famous and influential pederast [[Norman Douglas]]. Cleves sees Yuill's case as an example of the potential risks of writing and publishing on intergenerational relations.		The historian [[Rachel Hope Cleves]] summarizes Yuill's story in her award-winning 2020 book ''Unspeakable: A Life Beyond Sexual Morality'', examining once famous and influential pederast [[Norman Douglas]]. Cleves sees Yuill's case as an example of the potential risks of writing and publishing on intergenerational relations.

Thorn: /* Other major works */

2025-07-31T16:20:24Z

Other major works

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 31 July 2025
Line 42:		Line 42:
	Yuill has collaborated with [[Bruce Rind]], publishing a 2012 paper on the topic of [[Hebephilia]], within its historical and anthropological context. This followed academic controversy over the idea of Hebephilia as a form of pathology - something Yuill and Rind argue is ahistorical.		Yuill has collaborated with [[Bruce Rind]], publishing a 2012 paper on the topic of [[Hebephilia]], within its historical and anthropological context. This followed academic controversy over the idea of Hebephilia as a form of pathology - something Yuill and Rind argue is ahistorical.

	Yuill himself details his experience of facing researcher stigma and media attack in his 2010 scholarly article ''Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex''.<ref>[https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/interrogating-essential-moral-baselines-adult-child-sex Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex]</ref> He documents attacks on himself and past researchers most fully in a contribution to [[Censoring Sex Research]] (2013), with a book chapter titled ''Intergenerational Sexualities: A Case Study on the Colonization of Late Modern Sexual Subjects and Researcher Agendas''.<ref>[https://library.lol/main/20CD5808BA3977780E914855954E456F libgen: Censoring Sex Research]</ref> The historian [[Rachel Hope Cleves]] summarizes Yuill's story in her award-winning 2020 book ''Unspeakable: A Life Beyond Sexual Morality'', examining once famous and influential pederast [[Norman Douglas]]. Cleves sees Yuill's case as an example of the potential risks of writing and publishing on intergenerational relations.		Yuill himself details his experience of facing researcher stigma and media attack in his 2010 scholarly article ''Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex''.<ref>[https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/interrogating-essential-moral-baselines-adult-child-sex Interrogating the Essential: Moral Baselines on Adult-Child Sex]</ref> He documents attacks on himself and past researchers most fully in a contribution to [[Censoring Sex Research]] (2013), with a book chapter titled ''Intergenerational Sexualities: A Case Study on the Colonization of Late Modern Sexual Subjects and Researcher Agendas''.<ref>[https://library.lol/main/20CD5808BA3977780E914855954E456F libgen: Censoring Sex Research]</ref> (See also his archived article ''A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities''<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20211206155119/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=A%20Critical%20Analysis%20of%20Subjectivist-Based%20Theorising%20and%20Research%20on%20Male%20Intergenerational%20Sexualities A Critical Analysis of Subjectivist-Based Theorising and Research on Male Intergenerational Sexualities] by Richard Yuill (archived from williamapercy.com) </ref> which in part duplicate the book chapter)

			The historian [[Rachel Hope Cleves]] summarizes Yuill's story in her award-winning 2020 book ''Unspeakable: A Life Beyond Sexual Morality'', examining once famous and influential pederast [[Norman Douglas]]. Cleves sees Yuill's case as an example of the potential risks of writing and publishing on intergenerational relations.

	==See also==		==See also==

Thorn: /* External links */

2025-07-31T15:44:25Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 31 July 2025
Line 62:		Line 62:

	*[https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/dec/02/research.children The Guardian] - Wrap-up of the controversy.		*[https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/dec/02/research.children The Guardian] - Wrap-up of the controversy.
	*[http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Abstract Yuill PhD Abstract]		*[https://web.archive.org/web/20210613210913/http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Abstract Yuill PhD Abstract]
	*[http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2795/1/2004YuillPhdv1.pdf Full Thesis at the UoG]		*[http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2795/1/2004YuillPhdv1.pdf Full Thesis at the UoG]
	*[http://~~www.~~williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bibliography Yuill PhD Biblio]		*[https://web.archive.org/web/20200814105430/http://williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bibliography Yuill PhD Biblio]
	*[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=192834&sectioncode=26 Answering back] - Letter from Yuill to THE, see above for testimony if paywall active.		*[http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=192834&sectioncode=26 Answering back] - Letter from Yuill to THE, see above for testimony if paywall active.
	*[https://www.ipce.info/imo-archive/bg_2004/Yuill_reactions.htm Yuill reactions] - Ipce summarizes some of the media fallout.		*[https://www.ipce.info/imo-archive/bg_2004/Yuill_reactions.htm Yuill reactions] - Ipce summarizes some of the media fallout.

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category: Queer Theory]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Gay]][[Category:Sociological Theory]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Youth]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research on "Child Molesters"]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Broader Perspectives]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: British]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]][[Category:History & Events: British]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category: Queer Theory]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:Gay]][[Category:Sociological Theory]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Youth]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research on "Child Molesters"]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Broader Perspectives]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: British]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Critical Analysts]][[Category:History & Events: Personal Scandals]][[Category:History & Events: British]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]

Thorn: /* See also */

2025-07-24T16:40:23Z

Prue at 21:47, 14 December 2024

2024-12-14T21:47:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 14 December 2024
Line 24:		Line 24:
	In 2018, a UK based academic named David Pilgrim, whose work attempts to apply critical realist<ref>[https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ces/research/current/socialtheory/maps/criticalrealism/ Critical Realism]</ref> theory to intergenerational relations ("CSA" in his terms), critcized Yuill for what he saw as "libertarian pleading" and allyship with "moral panic theory" on Yuill's part. Yuill wrote a response to this, which remains unpublished and is instead [[Media:Richard_Yuill_Letter_October_2020.pdf\|made available here]].		In 2018, a UK based academic named David Pilgrim, whose work attempts to apply critical realist<ref>[https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ces/research/current/socialtheory/maps/criticalrealism/ Critical Realism]</ref> theory to intergenerational relations ("CSA" in his terms), critcized Yuill for what he saw as "libertarian pleading" and allyship with "moral panic theory" on Yuill's part. Yuill wrote a response to this, which remains unpublished and is instead [[Media:Richard_Yuill_Letter_October_2020.pdf\|made available here]].

	This not the first time Pilgrim has faced criticism for his comments against ~~reseachers~~ he opposes. The scholars Mark Smith, Vivien E. Cree, and Gary Clapton, who have applied moral panic theory to analyze UK child protection discourses in articles such as ''Moral panics and social work: Towards a sceptical view of UK child protection'' (2012)<ref>[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0261018312457860 Moral panics and social work: Towards a sceptical view of UK child protection ]</ref>, and the edited volume ''Revisiting Moral Panics'' (2015)<ref>[https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t88xwr Revisiting Moral Panics]</ref>, wrote that Pilgrim had decided "to use our book, ''Revisiting moral panics'' (Cree et al, 2015), to construct a straw man, which needs to be knocked down to preserve his own particular view of child sexual abuse."<ref>[https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/crsw/5/2/article-p223.xml Cree et al p223]</ref> Pilgrim responded, making "a brief concession [...] to a couple of points".<ref>[https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/crsw/5/3/article-p351.xml Cree et al p351]</ref> Later, in October 2020, Dr. Yuill's response to Pilgrim also criticized him for his use of "straw men arguments," and further, sees Pilgrim's tone and arguments as "a disservice to academic discourse and professional conduct." Yuill wrote:		This not the first time Pilgrim has faced criticism for his comments against researchers he opposes. The scholars [[Mark Smith]], Vivien E. Cree, and Gary Clapton, who have applied moral panic theory to analyze UK child protection discourses in articles such as ''Moral panics and social work: Towards a sceptical view of UK child protection'' (2012)<ref>[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0261018312457860 Moral panics and social work: Towards a sceptical view of UK child protection ]</ref>, and the edited volume ''Revisiting Moral Panics'' (2015)<ref>[https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t88xwr Revisiting Moral Panics]</ref>, wrote that Pilgrim had decided "to use our book, ''Revisiting moral panics'' (Cree et al, 2015), to construct a straw man, which needs to be knocked down to preserve his own particular view of child sexual abuse."<ref>[https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/crsw/5/2/article-p223.xml Cree et al p223]</ref> Pilgrim responded, making "a brief concession [...] to a couple of points".<ref>[https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/crsw/5/3/article-p351.xml Cree et al p351]</ref> Later, in October 2020, Dr. Yuill's response to Pilgrim also criticized him for his use of "straw men arguments," and further, sees Pilgrim's tone and arguments as "a disservice to academic discourse and professional conduct." Yuill wrote:

	<blockquote>''The issue of protecting children and young people from sexual abuse is certainly one that academics and policy makers should take seriously. There is no argument there and I actually carried out interviews with several male survivors of abuse. The fact that I conducted research which also looked at marginalised positions (boylovers and positive accounts from young people of their sexual relationships with adults) should be the bread and butter of any serious ethnographic researcher.''<ref>[[Media:Richard_Yuill_Letter_October_2020.pdf\|Richard Yuill's 2020 Letter]]</ref></blockquote>		<blockquote>''The issue of protecting children and young people from sexual abuse is certainly one that academics and policy makers should take seriously. There is no argument there and I actually carried out interviews with several male survivors of abuse. The fact that I conducted research which also looked at marginalised positions (boylovers and positive accounts from young people of their sexual relationships with adults) should be the bread and butter of any serious ethnographic researcher.''<ref>[[Media:Richard_Yuill_Letter_October_2020.pdf\|Richard Yuill's 2020 Letter]]</ref></blockquote>

Thorn: /* Other major works */

2024-12-12T16:44:06Z

Other major works

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 12 December 2024
Line 38:		Line 38:
	==Other major works==		==Other major works==

	Despite [[censorship]] of his work from Sociological Research Online, Sexualities, and Sociological Review, Yuill has published two Encyclopedia articles. The first, co-authored with his PhD supervisor David T. Evans, was the entry for [[pedophilia]] in “The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology” in 2007.<ref>[https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp013 Pedophilia, by Richard Yuill and David T. Evans]. Sci-hub link.</ref> The second was an entry for [[pederasty]] in Greenwood’s [[Media:Yuill on Pederasty (2008 book chapter).pdf\|Love, Courtship and Sexuality through history, Volume 6]], in 2008. He has also published a critical commentary of [[Diederik Janssen]]'s "Re-Queering queer youth development: A Post-Developmental Approach to Childhood and Pedagogy" entitled "Re-scheduling child sexual trajectories” in the Journal of LGBT Youth, 2008, 5(3).<ref>[https://sci-hub.st/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19361650802162409 Re-scheduling child sexual trajectories” in the Journal of LGBT Youth, 2008, 5(3)]. Sci-hub link.</ref> Written with [[Dean Durber]], "‘Querying’ the Limits of Queering Boys Through the Contested Discourses on Sexuality" was published in ''Sexuality & Culture''.<ref>[https://sci-hub.st/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-008-9034-x ‘Querying’ the Limits of Queering Boys Through the Contested Discourses on Sexuality (2008)]. Sci-hub link.</ref>		Despite [[censorship]] of his work from Sociological Research Online, Sexualities, and Sociological Review, Yuill has published two Encyclopedia articles. The first, co-authored with his PhD supervisor [[David T. Evans]], was the entry for [[pedophilia]] in “The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology” in 2007.<ref>[https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp013 Pedophilia, by Richard Yuill and David T. Evans]. Sci-hub link.</ref> The second was an entry for [[pederasty]] in Greenwood’s [[Media:Yuill on Pederasty (2008 book chapter).pdf\|Love, Courtship and Sexuality through history, Volume 6]], in 2008. He has also published a critical commentary of [[Diederik Janssen]]'s "Re-Queering queer youth development: A Post-Developmental Approach to Childhood and Pedagogy" entitled "Re-scheduling child sexual trajectories” in the Journal of LGBT Youth, 2008, 5(3).<ref>[https://sci-hub.st/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19361650802162409 Re-scheduling child sexual trajectories” in the Journal of LGBT Youth, 2008, 5(3)]. Sci-hub link.</ref> Written with [[Dean Durber]], "‘Querying’ the Limits of Queering Boys Through the Contested Discourses on Sexuality" was published in ''Sexuality & Culture''.<ref>[https://sci-hub.st/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-008-9034-x ‘Querying’ the Limits of Queering Boys Through the Contested Discourses on Sexuality (2008)]. Sci-hub link.</ref>

	Yuill has collaborated with [[Bruce Rind]], publishing a 2012 paper on the topic of [[Hebephilia]], within its historical and anthropological context. This followed academic controversy over the idea of Hebephilia as a form of pathology - something Yuill and Rind argue is ahistorical.		Yuill has collaborated with [[Bruce Rind]], publishing a 2012 paper on the topic of [[Hebephilia]], within its historical and anthropological context. This followed academic controversy over the idea of Hebephilia as a form of pathology - something Yuill and Rind argue is ahistorical.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:40, 24 July 2025
Line 52:		Line 52:
	*[[Chris Brand]]		*[[Chris Brand]]
	*[[Leonardo Arce Vidal]]		*[[Leonardo Arce Vidal]]
			*[[Beert Verstraete]]
	</div>		</div>

	==References==		==References==