Roderik Muit - Revision history

The Admins at 16:34, 19 February 2023

2023-02-19T16:34:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 19 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	__NOTOC__'''Roderik Muit''' (b. April 27, 1974) is a successful IT professional from the ~~[[National Profile:~~ Netherlands~~\|Netherlands]]~~, known for his work in defence of free speech on the internet, and voluntary self-identification as a [[minor-attracted person]] ([[Boylove]]r).		__NOTOC__'''Roderik Muit''' (b. April 27, 1974) is a successful IT professional from the Netherlands, known for his work in defence of free speech on the internet, and voluntary self-identification as a [[minor-attracted person]] ([[Boylove]]r).

	==Information technology, and internet activities==		==Information technology, and internet activities==
Line 27:		Line 27:
	* '''Self-defence:'''		* '''Self-defence:'''

	Despite a prolonged campaign of harassment carried out by self-described Dutch "Pedo Hunter" and convicted criminal [[Yvonne van Hertum]], Muit is just as frequently criticised and libelled by ~~[[National Profile: America\|~~American]] [[anti]]-pedophile bloggers, operating under pseudonyms. Muit's grounding in IT allows him to defend himself with direct responses on his own website. In addressing obvious libel, these responses tend to come across as more authoritative and dignified than the speculation of American vigilantes who have no personal knowledge of him. As Muit is known to have been accepted by friends and family, editorials describing him as a danger to children (for example, [[Wikisposure]]) sometimes come across as disingenuous, culturally insensitive and motivated more by hate than a genuine interest in the safety of minors.		Despite a prolonged campaign of harassment carried out by self-described Dutch "Pedo Hunter" and convicted criminal [[Yvonne van Hertum]], Muit is just as frequently criticised and libelled by American [[anti]]-pedophile bloggers, operating under pseudonyms. Muit's grounding in IT allows him to defend himself with direct responses on his own website. In addressing obvious libel, these responses tend to come across as more authoritative and dignified than the speculation of American vigilantes who have no personal knowledge of him. As Muit is known to have been accepted by friends and family, editorials describing him as a danger to children (for example, [[Wikisposure]]) sometimes come across as disingenuous, culturally insensitive and motivated more by hate than a genuine interest in the safety of minors.

	* '''Openness:'''		* '''Openness:'''

The Admins at 13:55, 19 February 2023

2023-02-19T13:55:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 19 February 2023
Line 23:		Line 23:
	* '''Unpointed disclosure:'''		* '''Unpointed disclosure:'''

	Whilst others have made a primary point of coming out as attracted to youth, Muit only refuses to deny this attraction. In this sense, sexuality is not something that he actively forces upon others, but something that he is unwilling to live in denial over. Muit does not run sites that repeatedly push the fact that he has an attraction to under-age boys for example. He is also known not to identify as a "pedophile" to people who would infer danger and mental illness from the term, as his own life history clearly contradicts this.		Whilst others have made a primary point of coming out as attracted to youth, Muit only refuses to deny this attraction. In this sense, sexuality is not something that he actively forces upon others, but something that he is unwilling to live in denial over. Muit does not run sites that repeatedly push the fact that he has an attraction to under-age boys for example. He is also known not to identify as a "[[Pedophilia\|pedophile]]" to people who would infer danger and mental illness from the term, as his own life history clearly contradicts this.

	* '''Self-defence:'''		* '''Self-defence:'''

	Despite a prolonged campaign of harassment carried out by self-described Dutch "Pedo Hunter" and convicted criminal [[Yvonne van Hertum]], Muit is just as frequently criticised and libelled by [[National Profile: America\|American]] anti-pedophile bloggers, operating under pseudonyms. Muit's grounding in IT allows him to defend himself with direct responses on his own website. In addressing obvious libel, these responses tend to come across as more authoritative and dignified than the speculation of American vigilantes who have no personal knowledge of him. As Muit is known to have been accepted by friends and family, editorials describing him as a danger to children (for example, [[Wikisposure]]) sometimes come across as disingenuous, culturally insensitive and motivated more by hate than a genuine interest in the safety of minors.		Despite a prolonged campaign of harassment carried out by self-described Dutch "Pedo Hunter" and convicted criminal [[Yvonne van Hertum]], Muit is just as frequently criticised and libelled by [[National Profile: America\|American]] [[anti]]-pedophile bloggers, operating under pseudonyms. Muit's grounding in IT allows him to defend himself with direct responses on his own website. In addressing obvious libel, these responses tend to come across as more authoritative and dignified than the speculation of American vigilantes who have no personal knowledge of him. As Muit is known to have been accepted by friends and family, editorials describing him as a danger to children (for example, [[Wikisposure]]) sometimes come across as disingenuous, culturally insensitive and motivated more by hate than a genuine interest in the safety of minors.

	* '''Openness:'''		* '''Openness:'''

The Admins at 00:12, 19 May 2022

2022-05-19T00:12:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 19 May 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:''Main article: [[Dutch Princess Photograph Controversy]].''		:''Main article: [[Dutch Princess Photograph Controversy]].''

	A major turning point in Muit's public life came in October 2007, when he defended the MARTIJN Association against a lawsuit, brought by the Dutch Royal family's. The lawsuit, based upon an incident in which a MARTIJN forum member posted pictures of the Royal Family, was supported by the false allegations of [[Yvonne van Hertum]], and her lobbying of the media.		A major turning point in Muit's public life came in October 2007, when he defended the MARTIJN Association against a lawsuit, brought by the Dutch Royal family. The lawsuit, based upon an incident in which a MARTIJN forum member posted pictures of the Royal Family, was supported by the false allegations of [[Yvonne van Hertum]], and her lobbying of the media.

	Muit claims that he lost paid work as a result of van Hertum's ~~resultant~~ approaches towards his work contacts.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/27#lostjob</ref>		Muit claims that he lost paid work as a result of van Hertum's approaches towards his work contacts.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/27#lostjob</ref>

	==Purpose and nature of self-identification==		==Purpose and nature of self-identification==

JohnHolt at 17:59, 19 September 2021

2021-09-19T17:59:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 19 September 2021
Line 42:		Line 42:
	*[http://roderik.muit.nl/node/208 Roderik's response to Wikisposure]		*[http://roderik.muit.nl/node/208 Roderik's response to Wikisposure]

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:TV & Media]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Dutch]][[Category:People: Adult or Minor sexually attracted to or involved with the other]][[Category:Law/Crime]][[Category:Law/Crime: Dutch~~]][[Category:History & Events~~]][[Category:History & Events: Dutch]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:TV & Media]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Dutch]][[Category:People: Adult or Minor sexually attracted to or involved with the other]][[Category:Law/Crime]][[Category:Law/Crime: Dutch]][[Category:History & Events: Dutch]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]

The Admins: /* Information technology, and internet activities */

2009-11-15T21:33:36Z

Information technology, and internet activities

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 15 November 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:''Main article: [[Dutch Princess Photograph Controversy]].''		:''Main article: [[Dutch Princess Photograph Controversy]].''

	A major turning point in Muit's public life came in October 2007, when he defended the MARTIJN Association ~~(with whom he is not affiliated) in~~ the Dutch Royal family's ~~lawsuit against them~~. The lawsuit, based on an incident in which a MARTIJN forum member posted pictures of the Royal Family, was supported by the false allegations of [[Yvonne van Hertum]], and her lobbying of the media.		A major turning point in Muit's public life came in October 2007, when he defended the MARTIJN Association against a lawsuit, brought by the Dutch Royal family's. The lawsuit, based upon an incident in which a MARTIJN forum member posted pictures of the Royal Family, was supported by the false allegations of [[Yvonne van Hertum]], and her lobbying of the media.

	Muit claims that he lost paid work as a result of van Hertum's resultant approaches towards his work contacts.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/27#lostjob</ref>		Muit claims that he lost paid work as a result of van Hertum's resultant approaches towards his work contacts.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/27#lostjob</ref>

The Admins: in progress

2009-11-11T01:55:36Z

in progress

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 11 November 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Information technology, and internet activities==		==Information technology, and internet activities==

	[[Image:Muit.JPG\|frame\|Roderik Muit]]In addition to having worked in the IT departments of a number of large companies, Muit has for a long time sought to provide affordable webspace to other persons who seek to publish unpopular ideas. This not-for-profit work has enabled a number of websites which discuss pedophilia openly to exist for far longer than they would have under ~~more~~ mainstream hosting arrangements. Muit is also one of the administrators behind the Dutch website ''pedofilie.nl'', ~~which exists mainly as~~ a ~~discussion~~ forum for ~~those who have an attraction to children and would otherwise have no one to talk to~~. ~~Muit's own experience of~~ the positive effects of ~~such discussion forums is~~ one of the reasons he ~~cites for continuing~~ to provide ~~technical~~ assistance to ~~related~~ websites.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/208</ref>		[[Image:Muit.JPG\|frame\|Roderik Muit]]In addition to having worked in the IT departments of a number of large companies, Muit has for a long time sought to provide affordable webspace to other persons who seek to publish unpopular ideas. This not-for-profit work has enabled a number of websites which discuss pedophilia openly to exist for far longer than they would have under mainstream hosting arrangements. Muit is also one of the administrators behind the Dutch website ''pedofilie.nl'', a forum for the open discussion of pedophilia. He cites the positive effects of catharsis for minor-attracted people as one of the reasons he continues to provide assistance to websites that discuss pedophilia.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/208</ref>

	===2007: The [[Vereniging MARTIJN\|MARTIJN]] case, and wider public exposure===		===2007: The [[Vereniging MARTIJN\|MARTIJN]] case, and wider public exposure===

			:''Main article: [[Dutch Princess Photograph Controversy]].''

	A major turning point in Muit's public life came in October 2007, when he defended the MARTIJN Association (with whom he is not affiliated) in the Dutch Royal family's lawsuit against them. The lawsuit, based on an incident in which a MARTIJN forum member posted pictures of the Royal Family, was supported by the false allegations of [[Yvonne van Hertum]], and her lobbying of the media.		A major turning point in Muit's public life came in October 2007, when he defended the MARTIJN Association (with whom he is not affiliated) in the Dutch Royal family's lawsuit against them. The lawsuit, based on an incident in which a MARTIJN forum member posted pictures of the Royal Family, was supported by the false allegations of [[Yvonne van Hertum]], and her lobbying of the media.

The Admins: /* Information technology, and internet activities */

2009-10-23T21:51:05Z

Information technology, and internet activities

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 23 October 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Information technology, and internet activities==		==Information technology, and internet activities==

	[[Image:Muit.JPG\|frame\|Roderik Muit ~~making a brief appearance on television during the MARTIJN case~~]]In addition to having worked in the IT departments of a number of large companies, Muit has for a long time sought to provide affordable webspace to other persons who seek to publish unpopular ideas. This not-for-profit work has enabled a number of websites which discuss pedophilia openly to exist for far longer than they would have under more mainstream hosting arrangements. Muit is also one of the administrators behind the Dutch website ''pedofilie.nl'', which exists mainly as a discussion forum for those who have an attraction to children and would otherwise have no one to talk to. Muit's own experience of the positive effects of such discussion forums is one of the reasons he cites for continuing to provide technical assistance to related websites.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/208</ref>		[[Image:Muit.JPG\|frame\|Roderik Muit]]In addition to having worked in the IT departments of a number of large companies, Muit has for a long time sought to provide affordable webspace to other persons who seek to publish unpopular ideas. This not-for-profit work has enabled a number of websites which discuss pedophilia openly to exist for far longer than they would have under more mainstream hosting arrangements. Muit is also one of the administrators behind the Dutch website ''pedofilie.nl'', which exists mainly as a discussion forum for those who have an attraction to children and would otherwise have no one to talk to. Muit's own experience of the positive effects of such discussion forums is one of the reasons he cites for continuing to provide technical assistance to related websites.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/208</ref>

	===2007: The [[Vereniging MARTIJN\|MARTIJN]] case, and wider public exposure===		===2007: The [[Vereniging MARTIJN\|MARTIJN]] case, and wider public exposure===

The Admins: /* 2007: The MARTIJN case, and wider public exposure */

2009-10-22T00:44:31Z

2007: The MARTIJN case, and wider public exposure

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:44, 22 October 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	===2007: The [[Vereniging MARTIJN\|MARTIJN]] case, and wider public exposure===		===2007: The [[Vereniging MARTIJN\|MARTIJN]] case, and wider public exposure===

	A major turning point in Muit's public life came in October 2007, when he defended the MARTIJN Association in the Dutch Royal family's lawsuit against them. The lawsuit was supported by the false allegations of [[Yvonne van Hertum]], and her lobbying of the media.		A major turning point in Muit's public life came in October 2007, when he defended the MARTIJN Association (with whom he is not affiliated) in the Dutch Royal family's lawsuit against them. The lawsuit, based on an incident in which a MARTIJN forum member posted pictures of the Royal Family, was supported by the false allegations of [[Yvonne van Hertum]], and her lobbying of the media.

	Muit claims that he lost paid work as a result of van Hertum's resultant approaches towards his work contacts.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/27#lostjob</ref>		Muit claims that he lost paid work as a result of van Hertum's resultant approaches towards his work contacts.<ref>http://roderik.muit.nl/node/27#lostjob</ref>

The Admins: dob?

2009-10-22T00:34:30Z

dob?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 22 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	__NOTOC__'''Roderik Muit''' is a successful IT professional from the [[National Profile: Netherlands\|Netherlands]], known for his work in defence of free speech on the internet, and voluntary self-identification as a [[minor-attracted person]] ([[Boylove]]r).		__NOTOC__'''Roderik Muit''' (b. April 27, 1974) is a successful IT professional from the [[National Profile: Netherlands\|Netherlands]], known for his work in defence of free speech on the internet, and voluntary self-identification as a [[minor-attracted person]] ([[Boylove]]r).

	==Information technology, and internet activities==		==Information technology, and internet activities==

The Admins: make more visible

2009-10-22T00:22:52Z

make more visible

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 22 October 2009
Line 38:		Line 38:

	*[http://roderik.muit.nl/ Webcorner] - Roderik's non-business site.		*[http://roderik.muit.nl/ Webcorner] - Roderik's non-business site.
			*[http://roderik.muit.nl/node/208 Roderik's response to Wikisposure]

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:TV & Media]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Dutch]][[Category:People: Adult or Minor sexually attracted to or involved with the other]][[Category:Law/Crime]][[Category:Law/Crime: Dutch]][[Category:History & Events]][[Category:History & Events: Dutch]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Censorship]][[Category:TV & Media]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Dutch]][[Category:People: Adult or Minor sexually attracted to or involved with the other]][[Category:Law/Crime]][[Category:Law/Crime: Dutch]][[Category:History & Events]][[Category:History & Events: Dutch]][[Category:History & Events: 2000s]]