Stephanie Dallam - Revision history

The Admins: /* Rind "Debunking" */

2022-09-16T01:12:21Z

Rind "Debunking"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 16 September 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:''"The purpose of the present article is to examine whether Rind et al. (1998) is best characterized as unpopular science or pedophile propaganda."''<ref>http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/dallam_02.htm</ref>		:''"The purpose of the present article is to examine whether Rind et al. (1998) is best characterized as unpopular science or pedophile propaganda."''<ref>http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/dallam_02.htm</ref>

	==Rind "~~Debunking~~"==		==Rind "debunking"==

	She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 paper<ref>http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html</ref> that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.		She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 paper<ref>http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html</ref> that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.

The Admins: /* Rind "Debunking" */

2022-09-16T01:11:42Z

Rind "Debunking"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:11, 16 September 2022
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Rind "Debunking"==		==Rind "Debunking"==

	She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 <ref>http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html</ref> that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.		She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 paper<ref>http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html</ref> that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.

	==References==		==References==

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Category:Research]][[Category: Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:People: American]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Category:Research]][[Category: Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:People: American]]

The Admins at 22:13, 22 September 2021

2021-09-22T22:13:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 22 September 2021
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Rind "Debunking"==		==Rind "Debunking"==

	She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 <ref>http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html ~~paper~~</ref> that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.		She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 <ref>http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html</ref> that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.

	==References==		==References==

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Category:Research]][[Category: Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:People: American]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Category:Research]][[Category: Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:People: American]]

The Admins at 22:06, 22 September 2021

2021-09-22T22:06:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 22 September 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Sdallam.png\|thumb\|Stephanie Dallam]]'''Stephanie Dallam''' R.N., M.S.N. is a pediatric nurse and child-protection advocate who uses science to advance a [[victimology\|victimological]] point of view, sometimes also accusing scientists of supporting and aiding [[Child Abuse]]. Lacking the mainstream credibility of [[David Finkelhor]] and the right-religious, media-friendly credentials of [[Judith Reisman]], Dallam has thus far been limited to occasional scientific advocacy, most notably her attacks on [[Bruce Rind]].		[[Image:Sdallam.png\|thumb\|Stephanie Dallam]]'''Stephanie Dallam''' R.N., M.S.N. is a pediatric nurse and child-protection advocate who uses science to advance a [[victimology\|victimological]] point of view, sometimes also accusing scientists of supporting and aiding [[Child Abuse]]. Lacking the mainstream credibility of [[David Finkelhor]] and the right-religious, media-friendly credentials of [[Judith Reisman]], Dallam has thus far been limited to occasional scientific advocacy, most notably her attacks on [[Bruce Rind]].

	Dallam, who is ~~allied to~~ a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA]		Dallam, who is the current secretary of a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".<ref>http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA</ref>

	Dallam's quotes in the media suggest that she sees herself as part of a [[pedophilia]] [[science war]]:		Dallam's quotes in the media suggest that she sees herself as part of a [[pedophilia]] [[science war]]:

	:''""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""''[http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/star_tribune.htm]		:''""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""''<ref>http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/star_tribune.htm</ref>

	:''""Is it open season on our children?" [...] "That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/04/17/adult-child-sex.htm]		:''""Is it open season on our children?" [...] "That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''<ref>http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/04/17/adult-child-sex.htm</ref>

	:''"The purpose of the present article is to examine whether Rind et al. (1998) is best characterized as unpopular science or pedophile propaganda."''[http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/dallam_02.htm]		:''"The purpose of the present article is to examine whether Rind et al. (1998) is best characterized as unpopular science or pedophile propaganda."''<ref>http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/dallam_02.htm</ref>

	==Rind "Debunking"==		==Rind "Debunking"==

	She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 [http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html paper] that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.		She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 <ref>http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html paper</ref> that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.

			==References==

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Category:Research]][[Category: Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:People: American]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Category:Research]][[Category: Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:People: American]]

Stephen James at 13:44, 4 June 2009

2009-06-04T13:44:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 4 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Sdallam.png\|thumb\|Stephanie Dallam]]'''Stephanie Dallam''' R.N., M.S.N. is a pediatric nurse and child-protection advocate who uses science to advance a [[victimology\|victimological]] point of view, sometimes also accusing scientists of supporting and aiding [[Child Abuse]]. Lacking the mainstream credibility of [[David Finkelhor]] and the right-religious, media-friendly credentials of [[Judith Reisman]], Dallam has ~~thusfar~~ been limited to occasional scientific advocacy, most notably her attacks on [[Bruce Rind]].		[[Image:Sdallam.png\|thumb\|Stephanie Dallam]]'''Stephanie Dallam''' R.N., M.S.N. is a pediatric nurse and child-protection advocate who uses science to advance a [[victimology\|victimological]] point of view, sometimes also accusing scientists of supporting and aiding [[Child Abuse]]. Lacking the mainstream credibility of [[David Finkelhor]] and the right-religious, media-friendly credentials of [[Judith Reisman]], Dallam has thus far been limited to occasional scientific advocacy, most notably her attacks on [[Bruce Rind]].

	Dallam, who is allied to a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA]		Dallam, who is allied to a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA]

The Admins at 04:33, 23 February 2009

2009-02-23T04:33:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:33, 23 February 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Dallam, who is allied to a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA]		Dallam, who is allied to a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA]

	Dallam's quotes in the media ~~would appear to~~ suggest that she sees herself as ~~being engaged in an anti-pedophile~~ science war:		Dallam's quotes in the media suggest that she sees herself as part of a [[pedophilia]] [[science war]]:

	:''""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""''[http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/star_tribune.htm]		:''""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""''[http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/star_tribune.htm]

The Admins at 03:12, 21 February 2009

2009-02-21T03:12:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 21 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Sdallam.png\|thumb\|Stephanie Dallam]]'''Stephanie Dallam''' R.N., M.S.N. is a child-protection advocate who uses science to advance ~~her ''child trauma'' agenda~~. ~~Most of Dallam's writings can be dismissed as pseudoscience somewhere in-between~~ the mainstream ~~appeal~~ of [[David Finkelhor]] and the ~~extremist~~, [[Judith Reisman]] ~~- a known homophobe and revisionist of~~ [[~~Alfred Kinsey~~]].		[[Image:Sdallam.png\|thumb\|Stephanie Dallam]]'''Stephanie Dallam''' R.N., M.S.N. is a pediatric nurse and child-protection advocate who uses science to advance a [[victimology\|victimological]] point of view, sometimes also accusing scientists of supporting and aiding [[Child Abuse]]. Lacking the mainstream credibility of [[David Finkelhor]] and the right-religious, media-friendly credentials of [[Judith Reisman]], Dallam has thusfar been limited to occasional scientific advocacy, most notably her attacks on [[Bruce Rind]].

	Dallam, who is allied to a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is ~~also~~ said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA]		Dallam, who is allied to a victimology-oriented advocacy group known as [[The Leadership Council]], is said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leadershipcouncil.org%2Fdocs%2FNova%2520Conference%2520brochure.pdf&ei=k4MwSNaJOpreQbjWof0C&usg=AFQjCNHL1CjiwrrByfNWG6xbrUJwUHnenw&sig2=PzWMhyD1_kb0g5o7Bc1yVA]

	~~From~~ the ~~following quote, it becomes apparent~~ that ~~Dallam believes~~ she is engaged in an anti-pedophile science war:		Dallam's quotes in the media would appear to suggest that she sees herself as being engaged in an anti-pedophile science war:

	:''""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""''[http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/star_tribune.htm]		:''""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""''[http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/star_tribune.htm]
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Rind "Debunking"==		==Rind "Debunking"==

	She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 [http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html paper] that attempted to ~~frame~~ the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) as ~~advocacy~~ propaganda. ~~What - apart from the~~ numerous misrepresentations ~~- is most surprising about this paper~~, ~~is that~~ the ~~author felt that she could base a large portion~~ of her critique ~~around what appeared~~ to be a guilt-by-association argument~~, and then accuse the other of abusing protocols of science for the purpose of non-existent advocacy~~.		She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 [http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/dallam/5.html paper] that attempted to "debunk" the work of [[Rind et al]] (also see [[Research]]) and expose it as propaganda. In response, Rind has pointed to numerous misrepresentations, distortions and errors in the Dallam paper. Whilst Dallam accuses her opponent of abusing scientific principles, her own critique is for the most part reducible to a guilt by association argument.

	[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Category:Research]][[Category: Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:People: American]]		[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]][[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Category:Research]][[Category: Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:People: American]]

Rez: haunted by FDs

2008-12-22T05:41:01Z

haunted by FDs

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:41, 22 December 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:''""Is it open season on our children?" [...] "That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/04/17/adult-child-sex.htm]		:''""Is it open season on our children?" [...] "That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/04/17/adult-child-sex.htm]

			:''"The purpose of the present article is to examine whether Rind et al. (1998) is best characterized as unpopular science or pedophile propaganda."''[http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/dallam_02.htm]

	==Rind "Debunking"==		==Rind "Debunking"==

Rez at 22:51, 18 December 2008

2008-12-18T22:51:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 18 December 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:''""Is it open season on our children?" [...] "That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/04/17/adult-child-sex.htm]		:''""Is it open season on our children?" [...] "That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/04/17/adult-child-sex.htm]

	~~:''""That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''~~

	==Rind "Debunking"==		==Rind "Debunking"==

Rez at 22:49, 18 December 2008

2008-12-18T22:49:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 18 December 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	From the following quote, it becomes apparent that Dallam believes she is engaged in an anti-pedophile science war:		From the following quote, it becomes apparent that Dallam believes she is engaged in an anti-pedophile science war:

	:""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""[http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/star_tribune.htm]		:''""What the pedophiles are looking for is some group of professionals to champion their cause," said Stephanie Dallam, a Leadership Council researcher. "Then they'll come up with a derogatory term to deride anyone who disagrees with them. Their claim will be to objective science, even though their science is sloppy and terrible.""''[http://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/star_tribune.htm]

			:''""Is it open season on our children?" [...] "That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002/04/17/adult-child-sex.htm]

			:''""That is just one hill in the battle" pedophiles are waging, she says. "Once they have the 15- to 17-year-olds, then it will be OK with the 12- and 13-year olds.""''

	==Rind "Debunking"==		==Rind "Debunking"==