<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3APrince_Andrew</id>
	<title>Talk:Prince Andrew - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3APrince_Andrew"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Prince_Andrew&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-30T05:48:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Prince_Andrew&amp;diff=21121&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>The Admins at 10:08, 25 May 2023</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Prince_Andrew&amp;diff=21121&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-05-25T10:08:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 10:08, 25 May 2023&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;==Good==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;==Good==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;I think way to go is &quot;List of publicly implicated MAPs&quot;, and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person&#039;s name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;I think way to go is &quot;List of publicly implicated MAPs&quot;, and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person&#039;s name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this. &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;--[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 10:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key newgon_wiki:diff:1.41:old-21120:rev-21121:php=table --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>The Admins</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Prince_Andrew&amp;diff=21120&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>The Admins: Created page with &quot;==Good==  I think way to go is &quot;List of publicly implicated MAPs&quot;, and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person&#039;s name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this.&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Prince_Andrew&amp;diff=21120&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-05-25T10:08:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;==Good==  I think way to go is &amp;quot;List of publicly implicated MAPs&amp;quot;, and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person&amp;#039;s name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==Good==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think way to go is &amp;quot;List of publicly implicated MAPs&amp;quot;, and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person&amp;#039;s name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>The Admins</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>