<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ARichard_Stallman</id>
	<title>Talk:Richard Stallman - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ARichard_Stallman"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Richard_Stallman&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-29T19:44:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Richard_Stallman&amp;diff=5929&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Jillium: New page: 05 June 2006: &quot;Dutch pedophiles have formed a political party to campaign for legalization. I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it ca...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Richard_Stallman&amp;diff=5929&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2009-10-06T05:17:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: 05 June 2006: &amp;quot;Dutch pedophiles have formed a political party to campaign for legalization. I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it ca...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;05 June 2006: &amp;quot;Dutch pedophiles have formed a political party to campaign for legalization. I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children. The arguments that it causes harm seem to be based on cases which aren&amp;#039;t voluntary, which are then stretched by parents who are horrified by the idea that their little baby is maturing.&amp;quot;[http://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20June%202006%20%28Dutch%20paedophiles%20form%20political%20party%29]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
28 June 2003: &amp;quot;The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, &amp;quot;prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia&amp;quot; also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.&amp;quot;[http://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html] [[User:Jillium|Jillium]] 05:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jillium</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>