Skip to main content

Uncommon Sense

On a Seasonal note…

Strato
Last modified on December 21, 2007

Stood in a store checkout queue yesterday, my attention was naturally caught by a cute boy – luxurious brown hair; soft, creamy skin; enormous blue eyes; maybe 5 or recently-turned 6. His mother, stood in front of me in the queue, was piling groceries (high-fat / high-salt ready meals, but that’s another comment) on the conveyor belt. The boy, his attention suddenly captivated by a Labrador puppy playing by the door, wandered single-mindedly in its direction. His beaming smile of delight as he stretched an experimental hand towards one of the puppy’s silky ears was heart-achingly adorable. The two, boy and puppy, looked at one another with intense, happy curiosity.

Both heads – one brown, one golden – snap in the direction of the boy’s mother, as she bellows at him across the store to come back “Immediately”. Blue eyes turn downcast. Head droops. Blush turns cheeks scarlet. Bottom lip protrudes. Boy gets a rough yank by his arm: “Santa Claus doesn’t visit naughty boys”.

The concept of employing the ostensibly kind and jovial (yet capriciously totalitarian) Santa – the all-seeing, all-knowing, surrogate authority figure – to condition a child’s behavior, exemplifies the imposition of the social order, at work through the vehicle of parental control.

Values are non-existent outside the parent’s whims. What constitutes being “good”’ and “bad” means only “obedient” and “disobedient”.

How much difference is there between training a new puppy and raising a child in contemporary society? Both are meticulously disciplined through a system of reward/punishment, treat/threat, affection/fear, to comply unquestioningly with the random orders of the adult who owns them. If you obey, you are “good” and will be rewarded. Obedience is the highest possible value.

Society does not just expect obedience from the very young child, but demands it from young people of all ages, with the intention that once they are released from the parental home, they will be sufficiently conditioned to fulfill the role required of them as products of the system: work, pay taxes, engage in socially-accepted leisure activities, marry, invest in real estate, be good consumers, produce more offspring…and train them to continue the cycle…in perpetuity.

For the child, Santa Claus equates to the modern State. Apparently beneficent – provided you behave, unquestioningly follow orders, and fulfill your assigned role – it is ultimately only desirous of passive submission – and will use every form of guile and deception to ensure your compliance.

Ho, Ho, Ho.

3 comments on "On a Seasonal note…"

  • By the way, I’m making more progress with your updates to Debate Guide. Your bit on the NSPCC inspired a very detailed discussion with my friend.

    I’ll re-read this post when I am better able to, and I should be able to report all of those changes to D G, when they are done.

  • A good post, Strato.

    Deception is a tool of the trade.

    It is almost (if not literally) disturbing, how reliant our world is on the act of deception.

    I’ve never quite known, whether or not to discourage the use of “Ol Saint Nick”…I mean, on the one hand, I enjoyed the theater of it all, when I was a child…as I think most children do.

    “He” was one of those mythical creatures, which nobody really forcefully imposed upon me, after I’d crossed over into the realm of cognitive reasoning…I was just sort of allowed to comfortably fall out of the belief…and come to the personal realization, that “he” was a myth.

    Unfortunately, I can not say the same for “Jehovah”…That one took a lot more soul searching and personal agonizing, and many years of my life, before I could really see the pieces, and start placing them together in a way that made real sense.

    I think, “god” is a parallel to “santa”…as eternal utopia is a parallel to gifts…for good, little girls and boys.

    It all really is about carrots, and control…incentives and threats of dire consequence, to keep people under some form of control.

    It may not all be bad…I mean, children do need to learn lessons…but, you’ve ultimately got to question, when is it ever appropriate to use understood lies to teach these lessons?

    Some people even get really upset, when you expose the lie to their children…You tell the truth, yet…you are “wrong” for doing so?

    It makes you wonder where any line can be drawn, when a very basic ethical standard (telling the truth) is being violated, in order to promote other forms of behavior, which are ethically desirable.

    A bizarre phenomena, if ever there were one.

Comments are closed.