One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Talk:James Cantor: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New page: [http://www.apa.org/monitor/2009/06/random.html June's APA Moniter]: :Through such research, Cantor hopes to identify early causes of pedophilia and come up with ways to prevent its devel... |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 18:33, 8 June 2009
- Through such research, Cantor hopes to identify early causes of pedophilia and come up with ways to prevent its development. "I feel like one of the most rooted-for scientists in the world," he says. "Everyone wants me to be successful in these projects."
A semi-private listserv:
- > Or do you believe that sexual interest in children is a mental disorder even if it is not acted on, obsessive or productive of personal distress?
- Well, I can't give you any answer that has not already been widely discussed throughout the DSM literature: What does and does not count as a mental disorder depends on your definition of "mental disorder". There are definitions (and proposed definitions) that pedophilia fits, and I have read other proposed definitions that pedophilia would not fit.
- To the extent that any diagnosis is a societal statement about a behavior, the definition of mental disorder is not scientific. To the extent that it is not scientific, I have no opinion. As Richard Feynman said, "I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy."
Jillium 18:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)