User talk:Brian

Legal Information

I set up a portal for you to work from, and created the new article on Child Porn. I like the category idea, and think it could add another level of organisation to the wiki. I am however, keeping the wiki structure linear, mirroring the site as a whole. therefore, you will see that everything is linked from the main page. Daniel 13:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Brian 17:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Debate Guide

http://newgon.com/w/index.php?title=Debate_Guide&diff=prev&oldid=232

I've opened a new section that only concerns pedophile arguments. Daniel 14:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll work on that when I've completed the legal articles and the categorisation of current articles. Brian 23:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia

I don't think that PS and JAR are WeissPuppets. They can spell and have a basic reading of CSA for a starter. They may be Eide and Becker respectively, though. Daniel 08:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

This edit looks like a Weiss edit ("Thanks, [psuedonym]"), however I agree that more evidence is required. Brian 22:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey...

...I like it:

"Paedophile is a diagnostic name for those who have a sexual interest in pre-pubescent children. We will now refer to them as "Child Sex Abusers.""

http://www.enoughabuse.co.uk/page106.htm

I think Michelle Elliot is involved. Daniel 01:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

LOL. We could create a list of absurd anti-paedophile quotes about paedophilia. Brian 12:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

“There is no place in free society for a 36 year old man who has sex with an 11 year old boy”

http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?section=33&screen=opinion&news_id=56536

“In fact, the proudest day of my life will be when one of them kills himself and leaves a note saying

“I can't take it anymore. Stitches drove me to it””

http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/06/its-working.html

“The best thing us anti’s can do ist expose all of you and let the vigilantes beat your fucking brains out”

http://newgon.com/blog/?p=9#comment-125

“Just to clarify gentlemen, I am neither irrational nor vengeful, and I am most certainly no fool. The majority of Canadians support the reinstatement of the death penalty and have done so ever since it was abolished in Canada in the 70s. I happen to be in that majority. A recent, admittedly non-scientfic, poll in my community indicates just under 70% of the respondents favour the death penalty for pedophiles. We can't all possibly be insane and vengeful now can we? They and I support the death penalty because we know pedophiles are dangerous to the wellbeing of our children. It really is that simple.”

http://www.richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=21714&p=366953#p366906

peadophilles, by definition, intend harm and trauma to children, who are the most innocent people on this planet. dont you dare try and claim that you deserve respect.

(YouTube)

the criminal justice system should be changed to protect the public from these beasts, they should all be implanted with electronic chips so they can be tracked 24/7. repeat offenders should be castrated and have "beast" tattood on their foreheads, criminals rights?..pff.. our children have the right to live safely from these perverts..anyone who argues againdt this is probably a beast.

http://uk.messages.news.yahoo.com/Crime/threadview?m=tm&bn=UKN-CRI-Sex+Crimes&tid=4923&mid=4923&tof=2&rt=2&frt=2&off=1

"I don't understand why he cannot be charged with a terroristic act because I live in absolute terror that what he does will put my grandchildren in danger. If that's not terrorism, what is? I'm more afraid of him that I am of Osama bin Laden."

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/329158_pedophile27.html

There could indeed be a tribute page. A very large one. Daniel 12:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Do you have authors/usernames for those quotes? Brian 19:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I can provide them when I log on in my bedroom. Daniel 20:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Updated. Daniel 21:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

There is an additional quote in the updated list, although its inclusion depends on how one rationalises the sexual freedom of children, and is probably irrelevant and a distraction to a page on pedophiles. Daniel 22:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)