Stephanie Dallam: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]] | [[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:People]][[Category:People: Unsympathetic Activists]][[Category:Victims' Rights]] | ||
[[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]] | [[Category:People: Academics]][[Category:People: Pseudoscientists]][[Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]] | ||
Revision as of 11:42, 8 October 2008
Stephanie Dallam R.N., M.S.N. is a child-protection zealot who attempts to foist herself off as a clinical author on child trauma. The end result of most of her writings can be said to represent a shade of pseudoscience falling somewhere in between that of David Finkelhor and Judith Reisman - a sex-fascist homophobe and pedophile-obsessed revisionist of Alfred Kinsey.
Dallam, who is allied to a pseudomedical, victimology-oriented advocacy group known as The Leadership Council, is also said to have worked as "family nurse, practitioner [and] in pediatric intensive care for ten years at the University of Missouri Hospital and Clinics [and as a] nursing instructor at the University of Missouri—Columbia. She has written numerous articles on issues related to the welfare of children".[1]
Rind "Debunking"
She is probably best known as the author of a 2002 paper that attempted to frame the work of Rind et al (also see Research) as advocacy propaganda. What - apart from the numerous misrepresentations - is most surprising about this paper, is that the author felt that she could base a large portion of her critique around what appeared to be a guilt-by-association argument, and then accuse the other of abusing protocols of science for the purpose of non-existent advocacy.Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience