One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Talk:Virgin Killer controversies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:That wouldn't be a good idea. The [[Criminal Justice and Immigration Act#Indecent_images_of_children|Criminal Injustice and Racism Act]] criminalised any image which is derived from an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph. [[User:Brian|Brian]] 03:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | :That wouldn't be a good idea. The [[Criminal Justice and Immigration Act#Indecent_images_of_children|Criminal Injustice and Racism Act]] criminalised any image which is derived from an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph. [[User:Brian|Brian]] 03:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I guess [http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/6253/4chanpc8.jpg this] wouldn't be very encyclopaedic. [[User:Jillium|Jillium]] 03:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:45, 10 December 2008
Are there any better non-photo copies of the image we can host here? Rez (The Administrators - anonym) 21:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- That wouldn't be a good idea. The Criminal Injustice and Racism Act criminalised any image which is derived from an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph. Brian 03:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
