Talk:Research: Secondary Harm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:If it's any good, could you slip me a copy. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] 03:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | :If it's any good, could you slip me a copy. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] 03:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
::http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/1/31/718072/sdarticle.pdf | |||
::It's not particularly valuable, but still interesting. Especially that the police described a portion of the contacts as "voluntary" on the child's part. [[User:Jillium|Jillium]] 01:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:39, 18 May 2008
This could be interesting: "A review of cases of sexually exploited children reported to the Netherlands State Police"
- Studied cases of sexually exploited children in the Netherlands by reviewing reports made to police officers of 15 juvenile bureaus during 1978. Data are based on police officers' questionnaire responses concerning the cases of 106 3-11 yr olds. Characteristics of the sexual contact and of the perpetrators and reactions of the victims and their parents are described. Results indicate that most parents reacted calmly to sexual offenses committed against their children, possibly due to liberal attitudes toward sexual affairs that have become the rule in the Netherlands. [Jillium unsigned]
- That's:
- Wolters, W.H.G., Zwaan, E.J., Wagebaar-Schwencke, P.M. and Deenen, T.A.M. (1985)
- If it's any good, could you slip me a copy. Daniel 03:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/1/31/718072/sdarticle.pdf
- It's not particularly valuable, but still interesting. Especially that the police described a portion of the contacts as "voluntary" on the child's part. Jillium 01:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)