One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Template:EGLHarm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny1(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm | File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny1(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm | ||
File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny2(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm | File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny2(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm | ||
File:Syndrome.jpg|No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome" | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 00:24, 11 November 2021
-
Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm -
Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in The Guardian -
What victimologists say about youth perception + admissions of iatrogenic harm -
Some reading on secondary harm and perception/situational variables -
Daly's 2021 repetition of Rind (1998), finds that self-perception is far more important that abuse status -
General reading on intrinsic harm -
The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm -
The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm -
No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome"
.jpg)
.jpg)
