Child Pornography Laws: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
agreed course |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:''For research, see [[Child Pornography]]'' | |||
The definition of "'''child pornography'''" is the subject of much debate, particularly in courts. The legal definition varies across jurisdictions, however most countries prohibit photographs depicting minors engaged in sexual activity. Many jurisdictions, notably [[Canada]], also prohibit non-photographic pornographic media featuring children, including computer-generated images, texts, and even audio recordings. In many countries, including the [[United Kingdom]] and [[Australia]], nudist depictions of children are generally prohibited. | The definition of "'''child pornography'''" is the subject of much debate, particularly in courts. The legal definition varies across jurisdictions, however most countries prohibit photographs depicting minors engaged in sexual activity. Many jurisdictions, notably [[Canada]], also prohibit non-photographic pornographic media featuring children, including computer-generated images, texts, and even audio recordings. In many countries, including the [[United Kingdom]] and [[Australia]], nudist depictions of children are generally prohibited. | ||
Revision as of 13:45, 17 April 2008
- For research, see Child Pornography
The definition of "child pornography" is the subject of much debate, particularly in courts. The legal definition varies across jurisdictions, however most countries prohibit photographs depicting minors engaged in sexual activity. Many jurisdictions, notably Canada, also prohibit non-photographic pornographic media featuring children, including computer-generated images, texts, and even audio recordings. In many countries, including the United Kingdom and Australia, nudist depictions of children are generally prohibited.