One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.

Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about children and minors: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rez (talk | contribs)
m interval update
Rez (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
*[[Debate Guide: Prior experience|Prior experience]] - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience.
*[[Debate Guide: Prior experience|Prior experience]] - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience.
*[[Debate Guide: The fallacy of "sexual maturity"|The fallacy of "sexual maturity"]] - The concept, as used in child advocacy is fatally flawed.
*[[Debate Guide: The fallacy of "sexual maturity"|The fallacy of "sexual maturity"]] - The concept, as used in child advocacy is fatally flawed.
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: Cognitive ability|Cognitive ability]] - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Cognitive ability|Cognitive ability]] - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached.
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: Childhood innocence|Childhood innocence]] - Childhood innocence is ''not'' a state of asexuality that can be "stolen".
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Childhood innocence|Childhood innocence]] - Childhood innocence is ''not'' a state of asexuality that can be "stolen".


'''Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...'''
'''Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...'''
Line 14: Line 14:
*[[Debate Guide: Liberty-empowerment|Liberty-empowerment]] - Empowering young people will benefit them.
*[[Debate Guide: Liberty-empowerment|Liberty-empowerment]] - Empowering young people will benefit them.
*[[Debate Guide: Turn of events|Turn of events]] - How the reporting and prosecution of sex can change the perspective of a youth.
*[[Debate Guide: Turn of events|Turn of events]] - How the reporting and prosecution of sex can change the perspective of a youth.
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: Online dangers|Online dangers]] - The internet is generally not a dangerous place for minors.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Online dangers|Online dangers]] - The internet is generally not a dangerous place for minors.


'''Child advocacy is often illogical...'''
'''Child advocacy is often illogical...'''


*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
*'''Against:''' [[Debate Guide: Teen brain|Teen brain]] - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Teen brain|Teen brain]] - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.


'''From the encyclopedia...'''
'''From the encyclopedia...'''

Revision as of 19:17, 18 December 2008

Sex, children and minors are not incompatible...

Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...

Child advocacy is often illogical...

  • Against: The kids do not want it - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
  • Against: Teen brain - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.

From the encyclopedia...