23 Sep, 2024: Our collection of material documenting harassment, doxing and allegations of illegal behavior against MAPs, on the part of a purportedly "MAP" group, is now complete. A second article documenting a campaign of disinformation by said group is nearing completion, and will be shared here.
Talk:The Right-wing and Minor Attraction: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Correction: I think the author was a fellow named "pokairn90" or something. I think he is the one who made the first draft of the article if I recall correctly. Moving on, I think the article looks great. I've got some materials that could be added, especially as a way to make entries for different groups within the right, such as the manosphere, uncaps, alt-right, alt-lite, religious conservatives, pederasts, etc... | Correction: I think the author was a fellow named "pokairn90" or something. I think he is the one who made the first draft of the article if I recall correctly. Moving on, I think the article looks great. I've got some materials that could be added, especially as a way to make entries for different groups within the right, such as the manosphere, uncaps, alt-right, alt-lite, religious conservatives, pederasts, etc... | ||
And yes, images should be added to it to enhance the informative nature of the article. --[[User: | And yes, images should be added to it to enhance the informative nature of the article. --[[User:GeoTerra|Geoterra]] ([[User talk:Geoterra|talk]]) 18:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 22 October 2024
Cool cool, basically done on this one. Apart from maybe finding more sentences to link things, proofreading again / editing for clarity sometime later on, I think this one's about done. I guess we could add some photos, which was part of the original doc I was working from. Incredible work and I hope the original author (they go by Porcelain but idk how to spell it), thinks this is a good upload of their work. We should probably send it their way and see if they've anything to add... All best --Prue (talk) 03:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Correction: I think the author was a fellow named "pokairn90" or something. I think he is the one who made the first draft of the article if I recall correctly. Moving on, I think the article looks great. I've got some materials that could be added, especially as a way to make entries for different groups within the right, such as the manosphere, uncaps, alt-right, alt-lite, religious conservatives, pederasts, etc...
And yes, images should be added to it to enhance the informative nature of the article. --Geoterra (talk) 18:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)