Alvin Malesky: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rez (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Rez (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''L. Alvin Malesky''' is the author of a much quoted [http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-4721459/Supportive-distortions-an-analysis-of.html paper] which alleged [[Cognitive Distortion]] in the [[BoyChat]] community.
'''L. Alvin Malesky''' is the author of a much quoted [http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-4721459/Supportive-distortions-an-analysis-of.html paper] which alleged [[Cognitive Distortion]] in the [[BoyChat]] community.


==Fallacy==
==Commentary==


It is hard to take Malesky, his work and his conclusion of distorted thinking among pedophiles seriously. If a researcher ''believes'' that certain views concerning children and sexuality represent distorted thinking and then establishes that these views are common among a community of individuals known for holding different views concerning children and sexuality, it hardly amounts to a discovery or affirmation of the researcher's subjective beliefs.
It is hard to take Malesky, his work and his conclusion of distorted thinking among pedophiles seriously. If a researcher ''believes'' that certain views concerning children and sexuality represent distorted thinking and then establishes that these views are common among a community of individuals known for holding different views concerning children and sexuality, it does not amount to a discovery or affirmation of the researcher's subjective beliefs.
 
==External link==
 
*[http://paws.wcu.edu/malesky/ Malesky website] - with contact details.


==Reference==
==Reference==

Revision as of 21:10, 8 January 2009

L. Alvin Malesky is the author of a much quoted paper which alleged Cognitive Distortion in the BoyChat community.

Commentary

It is hard to take Malesky, his work and his conclusion of distorted thinking among pedophiles seriously. If a researcher believes that certain views concerning children and sexuality represent distorted thinking and then establishes that these views are common among a community of individuals known for holding different views concerning children and sexuality, it does not amount to a discovery or affirmation of the researcher's subjective beliefs.

External link

Reference

Malesky, L. Alvin, Jr. ; Ennis, Liam: Supportive distortions: an analysis of posts on a pedophile Internet message board, in Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 01-Apr-04