User talk:Brian: Difference between revisions
→Wikipedia: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I don't think that PS and JAR are WeissPuppets. They can spell and have a basic reading of CSA for a starter. They may be Eide and Becker respectively, though. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] 08:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | I don't think that PS and JAR are WeissPuppets. They can spell and have a basic reading of CSA for a starter. They may be Eide and Becker respectively, though. [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] 08:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACole_Dealton&diff=209758395&oldid=209726608 This edit] looks like a Weiss edit ("Thanks, [psuedonym]"), however I agree that more evidence is required. [[User:Brian|Brian]] 22:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:36, 3 May 2008
Legal Information
I set up a portal for you to work from, and created the new article on Child Porn. I like the category idea, and think it could add another level of organisation to the wiki. I am however, keeping the wiki structure linear, mirroring the site as a whole. therefore, you will see that everything is linked from the main page. Daniel 13:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks Brian 17:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Debate Guide
http://newgon.com/w/index.php?title=Debate_Guide&diff=prev&oldid=232
I've opened a new section that only concerns pedophile arguments. Daniel 14:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll work on that when I've completed the legal articles and the categorisation of current articles. Brian 23:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia
I don't think that PS and JAR are WeissPuppets. They can spell and have a basic reading of CSA for a starter. They may be Eide and Becker respectively, though. Daniel 08:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)