Debate Guide: Evolutionary logic

The application of Darwin's Theory of Evolution has become popular in both the pursuits of genuine analysts and politically motivated ideologues. Here we attempt a genuine argument that its logic casts doubt upon many of the sacred "truths" of the child abuse movement.

As Jack McClellan puts it:

"I definitely don't accept the view of the dominant culture that loving, noncoercive, consensual sexual touching with potty-trained prepubescent children is abusive and ruins them for life. What ruins them is the subsequent brainwashing by the "sex offender" industry that they've been damaged. The key test that this is nonsense folkways is that children have to be indoctrinated that pleasurable genital/anal touching is "bad touch" -- yet they instinctively and experientially know that touching a flame is bad touch, sticking a syringe in their arm is bad touch, being bit by a dog is bad touch, etc".

Throughout our childhood and adolescence, we are open to periods of development. It is natural to explore the urges which are accompanied by these stages of development; indeed it would make sense that the diverse interests which one experiences throughout their development are geared towards the purpose of personal growth and experience. Maybe we should turn today's prevalent social dilemma around from 'the effects of sex on youth' to 'the effects of no sex on youth'. Such a revised dilemma has far more relevance to the socially unspoilt, naked biological human, who's will to experiment for his own pleasure and development is at the very heart of his humanity, only to be repressed as unacceptable in this tiny slice of human history. We must think beyond our times!