Template:EGLPHP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:Schustertable.png|A comparison of various phallometric studies | File:Schustertable.png|A comparison of various phallometric studies | ||
File:PedoPrevalence.jpg|Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common | File:PedoPrevalence.jpg|Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common | ||
File:Pedoprevalence2.jpg|(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports | File:Pedoprevalence2.jpg|(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports | ||
2013 Tromovitch 1.jpg|Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia) | 2013 Tromovitch 1.jpg|Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia) | ||
2013 Tromovitch 2.jpg|Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd) | 2013 Tromovitch 2.jpg|Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd) | ||
File:Freund.png|Freund | File:Freund.png|Freund and Costell (1970) - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response | ||
File:FreundCostell.png|Freund and Costell (1970) alternative version: arousal levels to nude images | |||
File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is universal (see [[:Template:EGLPHC|characteristics]] and [[Research: Pedophilia as a sexual/erotic orientation|the associated article]] for more excerpts) | File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is universal (see [[:Template:EGLPHC|characteristics]] and [[Research: Pedophilia as a sexual/erotic orientation|the associated article]] for more excerpts) | ||
File:Searches.jpg|Search results suggest hebephilia is common | File:Searches.jpg|Search results suggest hebephilia is common | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
File:FHyyjPYX0AQBzwG.png|Example RV curve | File:FHyyjPYX0AQBzwG.png|Example RV curve | ||
File:Roder.png|Roder (2013) attractiveness and femininity ratings by age | File:Roder.png|Roder (2013) attractiveness and femininity ratings by age | ||
File:FHyylMWX0Agjj-e.jpg|Preference for neotenic features is common | File:FHyylMWX0Agjj-e.jpg|Preference for neotenic features is common | ||
File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Latest revision as of 04:10, 4 November 2022
-
A comparison of various phallometric studies -
Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common -
(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports -
Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia) -
Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd) -
Freund and Costell (1970) - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response -
Freund and Costell (1970) alternative version: arousal levels to nude images -
Hebephilia is universal (see characteristics and the associated article for more excerpts) -
Search results suggest hebephilia is common -
...as do porno trends -
...as do historical marriage trends -
Example RV curve -
Roder (2013) attractiveness and femininity ratings by age -
Preference for neotenic features is common -
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
