|
|
| (13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| ==List Editing== | | ==List Editing== |
|
| |
|
| [http://newgon.net/w/index.php?title=Template:Research:MA&action=edit Minor-attraction], [http://newgon.net/w/index.php?title=Template:Research:Op&action=edit Older partner], | | [http://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:Research:MA&action=edit Minor-attraction], [http://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:Research:Op&action=edit Older partner], |
| [http://newgon.net/w/index.php?title=Template:Research:Cm&action=edit Child/minor], | | [http://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:Research:Cm&action=edit Child/minor], |
| [http://newgon.net/w/index.php?title=Template:Research:Az&action=edit Anthropological/zoological]. | | [http://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:Research:Az&action=edit Anthropological/zoological]. |
|
| |
|
| ==Excerpt Graphic Library Editing== | | ==Excerpt Graphic Library Editing== |
|
| |
|
| *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLHarm&action=submit Harm and Characteristics] | | See [[Index of Excerpt Gallery Libraries]] for a full visual. |
| *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLBP&action=submit Broader Perspectives (Anthro/Animal/Evol)] | | |
| *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLConsent&action=submit Consent and Ethics] | | <div style="column-count:2;-moz-column-count:2;-webkit-column-count:2"> |
| *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLSC&action=submit Sociocultural Arguments] | | |
| *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLComp&action=submit Minor Competence, Development and Sexuality] | | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLPHP&action=submit Edit Pedophilia/Hebephilia Prevalence] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLPHP view] |
| *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLPHP&action=submit Pedophilia/Hebephilia Prevalence] | | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLPHC&action=submit Edit Pedophilia/Hebephilia Characteristics] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLPHC view] |
| *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLPHC&action=submit Pedophilia/Hebephilia Characteristics] | | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLLFF&action=submit Edit Laws, Facts and Figures] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLLFF view] |
| *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLLFF&action=submit Laws, Facts and Figures] | | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLCP&action=submit Edit Child Porn] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLCP view] |
| *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLCP&action=submit Child Porn] | | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLHarm&action=submit Edit Harm and Characteristics] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLHarm view] |
| | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLConsent&action=submit Edit Consent and Ethics] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLConsent view] |
| | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLYS&action=submit Edit Youth Sexuality (characteristics, exposure, teen preg, etc)] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLYS view] |
| | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLComp&action=submit Edit Minor Competence, Development and Sexuality] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLComp view] |
| | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLBP&action=submit Edit Broader Perspectives (Anthro/Animal/Evol)] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLBP view] |
| | *[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=Template:EGLSC&action=submit Edit Sociocultural Arguments] or [https://www.newgon.net/wiki/Template:EGLSC view] |
| | |
| | </div> |
|
| |
|
| ==Resources== | | ==Resources== |
|
| |
|
| There is a list of active lit-review projects [[Help:Research Resources|here]]. | | There is a list of potential lit-review starting points [[Help:Research Resources|here]]. |
|
| |
|
| ==Good news== | | ==Good news== |
| Line 63: |
Line 70: |
|
| |
|
| :Dineen (1999) took a similar position. She charged that the psychology industry (which she defines broadly to include psychologists, psychiatrist, psychoanalysts, clinical social workers, and psychotherapists) needs victims to justify the expansion of its domain. Accordingly, it "manufactures victims." Tavris (1993) made a similar charge with respect to the incest-survivor recovery movement. Thus, according to Costin et al., Dineen, and Tavris, child sexual abuse has become an arena of opportunism for and exploitation by some in the mental health industry"[http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume11/j11_1_3.htm] | | :Dineen (1999) took a similar position. She charged that the psychology industry (which she defines broadly to include psychologists, psychiatrist, psychoanalysts, clinical social workers, and psychotherapists) needs victims to justify the expansion of its domain. Accordingly, it "manufactures victims." Tavris (1993) made a similar charge with respect to the incest-survivor recovery movement. Thus, according to Costin et al., Dineen, and Tavris, child sexual abuse has become an arena of opportunism for and exploitation by some in the mental health industry"[http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume11/j11_1_3.htm] |
|
| |
| *'''The effects of media exposure during childhood'''
| |
|
| |
| :The instant effects of viewing prohibited material. What can these correlational studies tell us about the long-term effects, and are the conclusions supported?
| |
|
| |
|
| *'''The [Roman Catholic] Church''' | | *'''The [Roman Catholic] Church''' |
|
| |
|
| :Are offending rates among RC clergy higher than in other denominations? Are rates higher among clergy than among teachers, biological parents, foster parents etc? | | :Are offending rates among RC clergy higher than in other denominations? Are rates higher among clergy than among teachers, biological parents, foster parents etc? |
| | |
| | ::John Jay Rpt? [https://www.bishop-accountability.org/reports/2004_02_27_JohnJay_revised/2004_02_27_John_Jay_Main_Report_Optimized.pdf ''The Nature and Scope of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic Priests and Deacons in the United States 1950-2002''] |
| | ::See: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Jay_Report Wikipedia] --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 12:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| *'''Satanic Ritual Abuse''' | | *'''Satanic Ritual Abuse''' |
| Line 77: |
Line 83: |
|
| |
|
| *'''Modern inventions - "Sexting", "Teen Dating Violence"''' | | *'''Modern inventions - "Sexting", "Teen Dating Violence"''' |
|
| |
| *'''CSO laws'''
| |
|
| |
| Information on notification laws can go into recidivism article.
| |
|
| |
| :''In an attempt to reduce the occurrence of childhood sexual abuse, some state governments have passed legislation allowing the public access to sex offender registries. One of the ways this access is granted is through the world wide web (web). There is, however, limited research on the impact this type of community notification has on actual rates of child sexual abuse. This study investigates the opinions of 133 mental health professionals who work with sex offenders regard ing the implications of public sex offender registry web sites. Over 80% of the participants in this study do not believe that sex offender registry sites will affect the number of children who are sexually abused each year. Seventy percent of the respondents also believe that a listing of sex offenders on the web will create a false sense of security for parents, and over 60% of the respondents believe that sex offenders who are listed on these sites will become targets of vigilantism in their community. Implications, for future research are provided.''[http://www.springerlink.com/content/t46t1p162365472m/]
| |
|
| |
| :''Despite the fact that the federal and many state governments have enacted registration and community notification laws as a means to better protect communities from sexual offending, limited empirical research has been conducted to examine the impact of such legislation on public safety. Therefore, utilizing time-series analyses, this study examined differences in sexual offense arrest rates before and after the enactment of New York State's Sex Offender Registration Act. Results provide no support for the effectiveness of registration and community notification laws in reducing sexual offending by: (a) rapists, (b) child molesters, (c) sexual recidivists, or (d) first-time sex offenders. Analyses also showed that over 95% of all sexual offense arrests were committed by first-time sex offenders, casting doubt on the ability of laws that target repeat offenders to meaningfully reduce sexual offending.''[http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=2008-18509-003]
| |
|
| |
| :''Despite the fact that the federal and many state governments have enacted registration and community notification laws as a means to better protect communities from sexual offending, limited empirical research has been conducted to examine the impact of such legislation on public safety. Therefore, utilizing time-series analyses, this study examined differences in sexual offense arrest rates before and after the enactment of New York State's Sex Offender Registration Act. Results provide no support for the effectiveness of registration and community notification laws in reducing sexual offending by: (a) rapists, (b) child molesters, (c) sexual recidivists, or (d) first-time sex offenders. Analyses also showed that over 95% of all sexual offense arrests were committed by first-time sex offenders, casting doubt on the ability of laws that target repeat offenders to meaningfully reduce sexual offending.''[http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=2008-18509-003]
| |
|
| |
| :'' Releasing a sex offender from prison or placing the offender on community-based sanctions, only to have the offender commit a new sex crime, is a policy-maker’s worst nightmare. Fueled by misperceptions and public fear, sex offender laws have developed piecemeal and without rigorous empirical insight and testing. While policies and practices are well-intended, they are unlikely to resolve the very real social problem of sexual violence and may inadvertently increase victimization. Such is the possibility with residence restrictions. This type of law is among the newest in an ever-growing barrage of legislation designed specifically for sexual criminals yet what little research that exists suggests there is no correlation between residence and sexual recidivism. This article identifies 30 states with state-level residence restrictions and conducts a content analysis of each state’s legislation. Geographical and other assessments are also conducted.''[http://springerlink.com/content/041803n635rh3756/]
| |
|
| |
| :''Every state in the nation has an age-of-consent law making sexual activity below a certain age a crime. n157 In about half of all states, this includes sexual activity between age-peers under the age of consent. In 60% of states, lewd-conduct laws make all sexual activity illegal under the age of fourteen. n158 Since every state now has a minimum age well over twelve, n159 according to the above research, the majority of [*187] children could be guilty of a sexual offense...in many states, an age-of-consent violation triggers a Megan's Law registration requirement. In a number of studies, the majority of adolescents found guilty of sexual offenses used no force at all. n161 Of the ones that did use force, only 4% to 31%, depending on the study and the age of the victim, involved the use of some sort of weapon. n162 The lack of a clear distinction between consensual and nonconsensual illegal sexual behavior results in an often arbitrary distinction between perpetrators and victims, with the majority of perpetrators being low-income boys, most of whom are already being observed by the juvenile justice system and thus subject to extra scrutiny.'' (Garfinkle, E. (2003). Coming of Age in America: The Misapplication of Sex-Offender Registration and Community Notification Laws to Juveniles. California Law Review, 91(1), 163-208.)
| |
|
| |
| :La Fond, J. O. (2008). "Sexually violent predator laws and the liberal state: An ominous threat to individual liberty," ''International Journal of Law and Psychiatry'', 31(2), 158-71. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18346787]
| |
|
| |
| :Wakefield, H. (2006). "[http://www.ipt-forensics.com/library/jsocc_sl01.htm The vilification of sex offenders: Do laws targeting sex offenders increase recidivism and sexual violence?]," ''Journal of Sexual Offender Civil Commitment: Science and the Law'', 1, 141-149.
| |
|
| |
| :Perlin, M. L. (1998). "There's no success like failure/and failure's no success at all: Exposing the pretextuality of Kansas v. Hendricks," ''Northwestern University Law Review'', 92.
| |
|
| |
| :Merge [[SOR problems]]? [[User:The Admins|The Admins]] 21:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| *'''Familial Sensuality and Sexuality'''
| |
|
| |
| Raïssa A. de Boer et al., Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding. Nat Ecol Evol 5, pp. 949–964 (2021). <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01453-9>
| |
|
| |
| Victoria L. Pike et al., Why don’t all animals avoid inbreeding?, The Royal Society, 11 August 2021 Volume 288, Issue 1956 <https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1045>
| |
|
| |
| Human inbreeding avoidance: Culture in nature, in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Volume 6, Issue 1, March 1983 (34 pages) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00014850>
| |
|
| |
| Recent commentators have noted that the existence of an incest taboo is puzzling when there is little evidence to suggest that many people desire erotic encounters with their own immediate family, although they might find the idea of incest, pornography featuring or simulating incest, or step-relatives through marriage not related by “blood” to be desirable. It’s important to recognize a gap between fantasy and action.
| |
|
| |
| Two recent overview discussions include:
| |
|
| |
| Thomas O’Carroll, Review of Arthur P. Wolf: Incest Avoidance and the Incest Taboos, Two Aspects of Human Nature, in Sexuality & Culture 21, 323–329 (2017). <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9327-9>
| |
|
| |
| A. H. Bittles et al., (2002) Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility?, Annals of Human Biology, 29:2, 111-130 <https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460110075657>
| |
|
| |
| Abstract excerpt: “In most Western countries there is a widespread belief, fostered in part by historical prejudice and religious proscription, that inbreeding in human populations causes a reduction in fertility. […] To critically assess the overall status of fertility in consanguineous unions, data on 30 populations resident in six countries were collated from a systematic review of the literature. […] The results were, however, subject to a number of potential limitations, in particular lack of control for important socio-demographic variables. To overcome this problem, data on first cousin marriages were abstracted from the National Family and Health Survey conducted in India during 1992-1993. Multivariate analysis showed that fertility in first cousin unions was positively influenced by a number of variables, including illiteracy, earlier age at marriage and lower contraceptive uptake, but the most important of these parameters were duration of marriage and reproductive compensation. In net terms, consanguinity was not found to be associated either with a significant positive or negative effect on fertility.”
| |
|
| |
| Gregory C. Leavitt, (1990) Sociobiological Explanations of Incest Avoidance: A Critical Review of Evidential Claims, American Anthropologist New Series, Vol. 92, No. 4, pp. 971-993 (23 pages) <https://www.jstor.org/stable/680655>
| |
|
| |
| Ray H. Bixler (1982) Sibling incest in the royal families of Egypt, Peru, and Hawaii, Journal of Sex Research, 18:3, 264-281 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498209551152>
| |
|
| |
| Abstract excerpt: “Analysts of the incest taboo who believe that cultural determinants alone are a sufficient explanation of human incest avoidance frequently cite alleged sibling marriages in the royal families of Egypt, Hawaii, and Peru as supporting evidence. If full‐sibling incest were common in intact families in several populous societies (where mates other than siblings were available) incest avoidance theories involving genetic components, and natural selection theory itself, would be seriously challenged”.
| |
|
| |
| Ray H. Bixler (1983) The multiple meanings of “incest”, The Journal of Sex Research, 19:2, 197-201 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498309551180>
| |
|
| |
| Bixler advocates the importance of distinctions within research, something which remains an issue in 2021, in part because of a taboo around recognizing that those involved in incest can be “willing participants” as Bixler puts it. If researcher’s risk opprobrium for acknowledging their existence, why would they risk studying “willing participants”, “positive experiences”, or making distinctions?
| |
|
| |
| Abstract: “A host of different sexual activities between partners varying widely in age and degree of consanguinity are usually classified as "incest" and often analyzed in toto. Efforts to encourage investigators to draw distinctions between the various kinds of "incest" have not been very successful, in spite of the availability of both research and theory which suggest the need for a definitional reform. Several important theoretical and empirical issues can be clarified if analysts will specify, for incest partners, the ages, degree of consanguinity, the specific types of sexual acts in which they have engaged, the willingness of each participant, and how long and at what age they lived in the same nuclear family unit. The rationale for recording these data is introduced.”
| |
|
| |
| Yates, (1991) Differentiating Hypererotic States in the Evaluation of Sexual Abuse, Journal American Academy Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 30:5, pp. 792-795.
| |
|
| |
| Abstract: When young children behave in a sexual manner, they may be suspected of having been sexually abused. However, this behavior may or may not indicate sexual abuse. Case studies suggest that nonsexually abused children can manifest an increase in erotic behavior on the basis of unusually intense but nonabusive sexual experiences or as part of a compulsion. When the sexual behavior is secondary to abuse, it can be related to posttraumatic stress disorder or intense and prolonged sexual experience.
| |
|
| |
| Alayne Yates, (1982) Children Eroticized by Incest, American Journal of Psychiatry, 139:4, pp. 482-485 <https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.139.4.482>
| |
|
| |
| Abstract:
| |
| “The assumption that children involved in incest are passive, unwilling victims is an oversimplification of a complex situation. Young children may find such relationships gratifying and, when exposed over time to intense genital and extragenital stimulation, they often become highly erotic. This hypermature responsiveness may be viewed as learned behavior; the behavior is self-reinforcing and may be difficult to modify. The author describes three children to illustrate their arousal, inability to differentiate sensual from affectionate touch, early gender discrimination, and stereotyped role modeling. Foster homes are neither trained nor supported in caring for these children, so serial placements are common.”
| |
|
| |
| David Lester, (1972) Incest, The Journal of Sex Research, 8:4, 268-285 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00224497209550762>
| |
| Reasonable discussion of research bias.
| |
|
| |
| Lester writes:
| |
|
| |
| “Extensive bias is present in the research carried out on the participants in incest. First, the majority of subjects who come to the attention of researchers are those brought to court as a result of the incest behavior. This increases the apparent incidence in families from the lower social classes and the likelihood of incest being noted in disorganized, unstable families, since these variables increase the chances that the incest will be reported and legal action instituted.
| |
|
| |
| A second source of bias is that many reports of incest in the literature come from families in which some members are in therapy. This increases the likelihood that the participants will be seen as psychologically disturbed. These biases are apparent in that most cases of incest reported are instances of father-daughter incest whereas brother-sister incest is much more common.
| |
|
| |
| A third source of bias is that families are examined after the incest has been reported and legal or therapeutic action taken. These actions may have a profound effect on the family. Gligor (1967) did not find incestuous families disorganized or unstable as Weinberg (1955) did, and Gligor felt that Weinberg's data were a reflection of the disorganization brought about by the legal prosecution of the fathers involved. It is clear from the case reports that prosecution of the father followed by jailing or detention in a psychiatric hospital for many years has a profound effect on the daughters. Usually, the daughters are not allowed to see their fathers during this period, a separation that may be especially traumatic since commonly father-daughter incest is protracted rather than episodic. The guilt, sexual acting-out, and other behavior problems found in the daughters invariably commence after the discovery of the incest and the break-up of the home.
| |
| In addition, methodological problems are frequent in the research” (pp. 272-273).
| |
|
| |
| :Reamy, Kenneth J., and White, Susan E. (1987). "Sexuality in the puerperium: A review," ''Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16(2), 165-186.
| |
| ::"It has been written that "the survival of the human race, long before the concept of duty evolved, depended upon the satisfaction gained from the two voluntary acts of reproduction -- coitus and breast feeding" (Newton, 1971, 1973; Newton and Newton, 1972). Ellis (1935, p. 49) in his "Psychology of Sex" indicated that Bonnet in 1764 in "Contemplation de la Nature" wrote of "the sweet commotion accompanied by a feeling of pleasure" during lactation as reinforcing the "natural affection" of the mother for the child. In the early 19th century, Cabanis recorded that several lactating women reported that the children in suckling at their breasts produced in them "voluptuous sexual emotions" (Ellis, 1935, p. 49). Contemporary research by Robinson and Short (1977) has indicated a dramatic increase in breast sensitivity within 24 hr of parturition which lasts several days. They see this as a "key event" for activating suckling-induced oxytocin and prolactin release and suppressing ovulation during lactation. "The acquistion of postpartum nipple sensitivity might therefore be the key mechanism controlling the infant's present and future food supply, the mother's behavioral response and her reproductive cycle" (Robinson and Short, 1977, p. 1190).
| |
| ::Common physiologic responses of coitus and lactation include nipple erection, mammary venous dilation and breast warmth, and uterine contractions (Newton and Newton, 1967). Vaginal lubrication and clitoral sensations have also been described (Rossi, 1973). Milk ejection (squirting or spraying as well as dripping) can be triggered by sexual excitement as well as breast feeding (Campbell and Peterson, 1953; Fox and Knaggs, 1969; Harnes, 1980; Masters and Johnson, 1966). Breast stroking and nipple stimulation occur during breast feeding as well as sexual foreplay. Nipple stimulation, used clinically in antepartum fetal monitoring, predictably produces strong uterine contractions (Elliot and Flaherty, 1983; Lenke and Nemes, 1984). Neurohumoral reflexes involving oxytocin secretion may be similar in coitus, lactation, and parturition (Newton, 1973; Newton and Newton, 1967).
| |
| ::[...]
| |
| ::Lactating mothers reported sexual arousal, often to plateau levels of response, during nursing. Orgasm was reported on three occasions. Sexual excitement, including orgasm, associated with the suckling of infants has been reported elsewhere as well (Heiman, 1963; L'Esperance, 1980; Newton, 1971; Sarlin, 1963; Weichert, 1977; Weisskopf, 1980).
| |
| ::Although sexual pleasure manifested during lactation (and incompatible with the concept of asexual motherhood) is believed to be uncommon by some (Harnes, 1980; Lawrence, 1980; Waletsky, 1979), it may be more frequent than realized in uninhibited, unrestricted breast feeding (Pion and Reich, 1977; Riordan and Rapp, 1980; Rossi, 1973). Weichert (1977) indicated that 25% of lactaters in a small sample experienced sexual arousal with nursing. There are women who openly enjoy the sexual stimulation that breast feeding may afford (Sarlin, 1963). Others find it uncomfortable, distasteful, guilt producing, and intolerable to the extent that they wean their infants early (Heiman, 1963; Lawrence, 1980; Salin, 1963; Waletsky, 1979). It has been written that if the sensual feelings the mother experiences during breast feedlng "are accepted as a natural, gratifying maternal experience, (they can) strengthen the feeling of tenderness and commitment to her baby" (Riordan and Rapp, 1980, p. 111). Women have reported increased breast eroticism after the nursing experience (Riordan and Rapp, 1980). Anthropologic studies have revealed that attitudes concerning lactation and sensuality show marked variation among societies. The maternal-infant interchange within the Navajo culture is said to show "highly developed sexual innuendoes" including the occurrence of penile erections of the boy babies during breast feeding (Kluckhohn, 1957). Penile erections during nursing have been described elsewhere as welI (Newton, 1973; Sarlin, 1963; Weisskopf, 1980). The soft, contented "nursing songs" made by babies near the end of nursing when they are relaxed are "similar to the spontaneous noises sometimes made during coitus" (Newton, 1973 , p. 998). After breast feeding "there is often a relaxation (of the suckled infants) that is characteristic of the conclusion of satisfactory sexual response" (Newton, 1973, p. 82). (One might add that there is often a relaxation of the sated adult after a warm meal.) The psychoanalytic literature reports the presence of "vaginal sensations and contractions in suckled female infants" (Heiman, 1963). Sarlin (1963, p. 797) indicated that "the first stirrings of clitoral eroticism and the similar phallic erections during earliest infancy are associated with the passive mouth-breast stimulation by the erect eroticized nipple of the mother's breast during actual feeding." He described the nursing infant as "an active participant in an overtly erotic relationship" (p. 798)."
| |
|
| |
| :Nelson, Joan A. (1986). "Incest: Self-Report Findings From a Nonclinical Sample," Journal of Sex Research, 22(4), 463-434.
| |
| ::"In contrast to those studies documenting the damaging effects of incest, a few clinical studies reveal nondamaging incest. For example, Sloane and Karpinski (1942), using interviews from five clinical cases, stated that it was the least harmful, psychologically, for younger children with risk increasing as the subject approaches adolescence. They stated further that if a "nonparticipating adult" is comfortable with the incestuous relationship, harm to the child is decreased (p. 666). Henderson (1975) said that such relations do not always seem to have a traumatic effect and that it sometimes even "diminishes the subject's sense of psychosis and allows a better adjustment to the external world" (p. 1,537). Yorukoglu and Kemph (1966) reported minimal, if any, short term effects for one son in son-mother incest (p. 113). Bender and Blau (1938), utilizing the Stanford-Binet intelligence scale and interview data from four court-referred psychiatric patients, concluded that incest within an endorsing (supporting) family can be nontraumatic (p. 500). Fritz, Stoll, and Wagner (1981) found that 77% of adult women who had been victims of childhood incest had no difficulties with current sexual adjustment, had overcome negative consequences, or did not develop problems in the first place (p. 54).
| |
| ::In addition, a few surveys of nonclinical populations indicate that incest, even between adult males and female children, is sometimes nonproblematic. The Kinsey study of women (Kinsey, Pomeroy, Martin, & Gebhard, 1953) indicated that 20% to 24% of the women questioned had been molested as children, about 4% having been approached sexually by adult male relatives before adolescence. The Kinsey researchers said "the contacts often involved considerable affection, and some of the older females in the sample felt that their preadolescent experience had contributed favorably to their later sociosexual development" (p. 121). [...]
| |
| ::Schultz (1980), noting that incest research abounds in myths and cliches, states, 'It may be useful for professionals to assume trauma is absent unless clear evidence contraindicates" (p. 1)."
| |
|
| |
| ::[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,923966-1,00.html Researchers worth looking into]: James Ramey, Joan Nelson, Seymour Parker, Larry Constantine, Wardell Pomeroy
| |
|
| |
| *'''Identifying and correcting faulty methodology'''
| |
| *:So far in the professional literature only two types of children participating in intergenerational sex have been identified: powerless and precocious. Very little attention has been paid to the definition of precocious except as a negative outcome of exploitative early eroticization. The continuum model of intergenerational sexual contact, to be empirically correct, must allow for all kinds of children, including informed, consenting, and initiating participants. Such a balanced typology supersedes the unscientific belief that all children who consent and initiate do so because they are powerless. For children who do indeed consent because they are powerless, the continuum model suggests empowering them not by arbitrarily teaching them to say no to sex, but by teaching sex education in such a way that they know what sex is. Thus they will learn the difference between sex and exploitation so they will know which one it is they are refusing.
| |
| *:Until now it has not seemed necessary to classify the children other than as victims since children's sexual feelings have been denied or relegated to the categories of sex play and curiosity. As Okami (1987) points out, however, "these are the same impulses and behaviors that in adolescents or adults are characterized as sexual desire and sexual activity!' http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/nelson.htm
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Something useful on Riegel's site?== | | ==Something useful on Riegel's site?== |
| Line 174: |
Line 89: |
|
| |
|
| http://www.shfri.net/trans/hoffman/hoffman.cgi | | http://www.shfri.net/trans/hoffman/hoffman.cgi |
| | |
| | Shall we add a page on philosophy? A place for quotes from, say, Stephen Kershnar, Robert Ehman, Terry Leahy, Ole Martin Moen, Agustin Malon, Stephen Angelides, etc. Could go in the section on "Anthropological, zoological and broader perspectives" - i.e. a broader perspective? |