Talk:Prince Andrew: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) Created page with "==Good== I think way to go is "List of publicly implicated MAPs", and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person's name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this." |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Good== | ==Good== | ||
I think way to go is "List of publicly implicated MAPs", and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person's name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this. | I think way to go is "List of publicly implicated MAPs", and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person's name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this. --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 10:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:08, 25 May 2023
Good
I think way to go is "List of publicly implicated MAPs", and put as much or as little background there regarding high profile people who may or may not be MAPs but had some controversy surrounding them. We can then redirect the person's name to the listicle (like we do for most antis) if they do not have their own article like this. --The Admins (talk) 10:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)