User talk:Thorn

Position

Hi. Would you like me to add you as an editorial lead on the Newgon Support Team (Quantitative Research and Public Health, or Psychology and Science Communication)? The role is a membership role, entails no responsibilities, but just describes the general purview of an editor's work. --The Admins (talk) 19:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Yes I would! Thorn (talk) 06:47, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Califia

Lets entertain which of those should be in the chronological archive. --The Admins (talk) 09:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

I suppose the 1st edition Thorn (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Minor attraction in popular culture edits

Hi Thorn.

As someone who contributed much of the content in the Minor attraction in popular culture article, I appreciate that you added new entries for it as well as your effort in general.

But I do have some issues with you. Hear me out:

I saw that you added entries that were already present, meaning that the title in the list were repeated but with different descriptions, which may cause confusion. Matter of fact, you did it two times (notably, with the Death in Venice and Pretty Baby titles) in the live-action sub-section. So, next time you add any entry for the pop culture article, make sure to check if it was already added in the first place. You are free to add hyperlinks to the titles, and edit the description for any entry as long as you spell out the relevancy to MAPs. Just make sure to not repeat the same mistake, alright?

Yes, I am sorry! I occasionally skipped checking, but I'll be more attentive to that, thank you! Thorn (talk) 07:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Percy Wiki

Pretty sure Percy's Wiki will not come back online as Percy is sadly dead. I finished copying all of the info on Thorstad a while ago, and it was useful in the chronological archive. I'm sure they have info on other scholars and activists (far from all of the listed, it is predominantly a gay site that leads towards pederasty) that would be useful in building profiles and adding to the archive.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200924025231/http://williamapercy.com/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Scholars_and_Activists --The Admins (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Ok, I'll take care of that! Thorn (talk) 07:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Book by Filip Schuster

This book (in German) maybe has some useful information in studying and profiling historical "pedophiles". --The Admins (talk) 02:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll check this Thorn (talk) 15:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Update on doll research

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380114150_Berichtete_Konsequenzen_des_Verbots_von_Sexpuppen_mit_kindlichem_Erscheinungsbild_Eine_Inhaltsanalyse_von_Betroffenenaussagen --Jim Burton (talk) 18:20, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Tromovitch survey research

https://boychat.org/cgi/deref.cgi?url=https://doshisha.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000821/files/023065040009.pdf --Jim Burton (talk) 18:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

MAPTorrent Project

I notice on Matrix, someone has set up a large archive that goes beyond the original files saved by Peace. Would you be interested in copying any unsaved documents to our cloud storage and starting the process of publishing them in a useful order (via the chronological archive)? --Jim Burton (talk) 11:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Children, kink, fetishes

I found this useful review which may interest you, particularly the Brown, 2019 study and it's conclusions about children and BDSM. May be useful for the childhood sexuality review.

https://sexedrescue.com/children-kink-fetishes/

--Jim Burton (talk) 17:37, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Interesting! Thanks! Thorn (talk) 15:37, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Effects of pornography

I recently did a very brief sweep of literature for our effects of pornography review. I located one paper that might be useful for a deep read.

https://www.academia.edu/11604002/Saving_the_Children_Pornography_Childhood_and_the_Internet --Jim Burton (talk) 21:12, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

thank you!Thorn (talk) 14:48, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Fallacy List

There is a forum thread where a user has added some fallacies - a percentage of them are not covered on our list. Some of them also demonstrate how the fallacious argument might be used to argue in support of the subject.

Perhaps they could be added to our list, or integrated somehow. --Jim Burton (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! I'll think about it. Thorn (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2025 (UTC)