Talk:Debate Guide: Cognitive ability = consent: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "The philosophical arguments from Rind about the cyclical nature of the consent argument coming back to "it's wrong" might be a worthy addition --~~~~"
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The philosophical arguments from Rind about the cyclical nature of the consent argument coming back to "it's wrong" might be a worthy addition --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 22:35, 21 September 2021 (CEST)
The philosophical arguments from Rind about the cyclical nature of the consent argument coming back to "it's wrong" might be a worthy addition --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 22:35, 21 September 2021 (CEST)
The arguments on sexual inexperience and experientionism from both sides of the main index can be thinned down and combined into the 2nd paragraph here. Make new section of this article saying experience and voluntary high quality induction is more important than cognitive ability or any legal facet of consent. That way kids learn before the porn industry or religious can poison their minds. --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 09:30, 25 September 2021 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 07:30, 25 September 2021

The philosophical arguments from Rind about the cyclical nature of the consent argument coming back to "it's wrong" might be a worthy addition --The Admins (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2021 (CEST)

The arguments on sexual inexperience and experientionism from both sides of the main index can be thinned down and combined into the 2nd paragraph here. Make new section of this article saying experience and voluntary high quality induction is more important than cognitive ability or any legal facet of consent. That way kids learn before the porn industry or religious can poison their minds. --The Admins (talk) 09:30, 25 September 2021 (CEST)