One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Template:EGLPHP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:Schustertable.png|A comparison of various phallometric studies | File:Schustertable.png|A comparison of various phallometric studies | ||
File:PedoPrevalence.jpg|Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common | File:PedoPrevalence.jpg|Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common | ||
File:Pedoprevalence2.jpg|(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports | File:Pedoprevalence2.jpg|(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports | ||
2013 Tromovitch 1.jpg|Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia) | 2013 Tromovitch 1.jpg|Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia) | ||
2013 Tromovitch 2.jpg|Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd) | 2013 Tromovitch 2.jpg|Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd) | ||
File: | File:Freund.png|Freund and Costell (1970) - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response | ||
File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is universal | File:FreundCostell.png|Freund and Costell (1970) alternative version: arousal levels to nude images | ||
File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is universal (see [[:Template:EGLPHC|characteristics]] and [[Research: Pedophilia as a sexual/erotic orientation|the associated article]] for more excerpts) | |||
File:Searches.jpg|Search results suggest hebephilia is common | |||
File:FQSSgwLXMAErPOF.jpg|...as do porno trends | |||
File:FirstMarriageBinfordDataset2001.jpg|...as do historical marriage trends | |||
File:FHyyjPYX0AQBzwG.png|Example RV curve | |||
File:Roder.png|Roder (2013) attractiveness and femininity ratings by age | |||
File:FHyylMWX0Agjj-e.jpg|Preference for neotenic features is common | |||
File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Latest revision as of 04:10, 4 November 2022
-
A comparison of various phallometric studies -
Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common -
(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports -
Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia) -
Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd) -
Freund and Costell (1970) - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response -
Freund and Costell (1970) alternative version: arousal levels to nude images -
Hebephilia is universal (see characteristics and the associated article for more excerpts) -
Search results suggest hebephilia is common -
...as do porno trends -
...as do historical marriage trends -
Example RV curve -
Roder (2013) attractiveness and femininity ratings by age -
Preference for neotenic features is common -
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
