One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.

Introduction to Debate Guide: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Jim Burton (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:introsmall.JPG|frame|An introduction]]Welcome to Debate Guide - ''a comprehensive guide to challenging widely held beliefs in online debates concerning adult-minor and minor-adult sexuality, whether expressed or not''.
[[Image:introsmall.JPG|frame|An introduction]]Welcome to '''Debate Guide''' - the ''comprehensive'' guide for online debates on sexual attractions and relations between minors and adults.  


What the guide aims to do is instill confidence in those who may not otherwise speak out. When someone answers back in a particular way, you will find a response, including sources by looking it up here. Never before have distortions and fallacies in arguments concerning [[Minor Attracted People|MAP]]s - including hypothetical relationships, been addressed as thoroughly in one coherent guide as they have here.
Over 20 years ago now, this guide was first published by Daniel, a debater on secular-rationalist fora, to document the many distortions and logical fallacies common to arguments about [[Minor Attracted People]]. It was the first of its kind, and perhaps unsurprisingly, few have attempted to imitate it!


However, please note that this guide is not 100% a means to an end. As someone who uses the guide, an active reader should modify our advice to suit their own opinions and understandings, using initiative where they feel it will benefit them and their abilities. Readers should also remember that the guide is streamlined into sections, so valid material can be found in numerous sections and elsewhere on the wiki. We will ''try'' to link to relevant [[Research|research]] and encyclopedic content where appropriate.
'''Our aim is to give you the confidence to speak out and be heard.'''  


Lastly, it should be noted that since this guide has been designed to help people of many persuasions, you might find yourself agreeing with some of its content, and disagreeing with other parts. We must cover all bases, so that all of you can come out of a debate or dogpile looking reasonable - particularly to the passive participant (lurker).
In other words, if you see an argument on social media or online forums that looks uncanny, you will probably find the appropriate response here, accompanied by sources.
 
However, please note, this guide is not 100% a means to an end. As someone who uses the guide, you need to be an active reader. Active readers will modify our advice to suit their own style, using initiative where they feel it will benefit them. We will try to link to relevant [[Research|research]] and encyclopedic content where appropriate.
 
Lastly, it should be noted that since this guide has been designed to help people of many persuasions, you might find yourself agreeing with some of its content, and disagreeing with other parts. So see it as a toolkit, and not a manifesto.


'''Happy Reading!'''
'''Happy Reading!'''

Latest revision as of 19:04, 3 August 2025

An introduction

Welcome to Debate Guide - the comprehensive guide for online debates on sexual attractions and relations between minors and adults.

Over 20 years ago now, this guide was first published by Daniel, a debater on secular-rationalist fora, to document the many distortions and logical fallacies common to arguments about Minor Attracted People. It was the first of its kind, and perhaps unsurprisingly, few have attempted to imitate it!

Our aim is to give you the confidence to speak out and be heard.

In other words, if you see an argument on social media or online forums that looks uncanny, you will probably find the appropriate response here, accompanied by sources.

However, please note, this guide is not 100% a means to an end. As someone who uses the guide, you need to be an active reader. Active readers will modify our advice to suit their own style, using initiative where they feel it will benefit them. We will try to link to relevant research and encyclopedic content where appropriate.

Lastly, it should be noted that since this guide has been designed to help people of many persuasions, you might find yourself agreeing with some of its content, and disagreeing with other parts. So see it as a toolkit, and not a manifesto.

Happy Reading!

The Team.