Template:EGLPHC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
File:PedoAsOrientation.png|Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence? | File:PedoAsOrientation.png|Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence? | ||
File:Devped.png|Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths | File:Devped.png|Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths | ||
File:Retards.png|Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth | |||
File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | ||
File:Effectsoftreat.png|The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles | File:Effectsoftreat.png|The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles | ||
File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is normative | File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is normative | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 18:32, 22 December 2021
-
Americal Psychiatric Assiciation's DSM-5 Manual says pedophilia can be an orientation -
Charles Moser on the subsequent coverage and bumbling by the APA -
DSM-5 another graphic -
Some chronophilias -
Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence? -
Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths -
Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth -
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control -
The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles -
Hebephilia is normative
