One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Template:EGLPHC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | ||
File:Effectsoftreat.png|The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles | File:Effectsoftreat.png|The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles | ||
File:Female.png|Lievesley/Lapworth 2021 - State of play with female MAPs | |||
File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is normative | File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is normative | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 16:36, 30 December 2021
-
Americal Psychiatric Assiciation's DSM-5 Manual says pedophilia can be an orientation -
Charles Moser on the subsequent coverage and bumbling by the APA -
DSM-5 another graphic -
Some chronophilias -
Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence? -
Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths -
Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth -
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control -
The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles -
Lievesley/Lapworth 2021 - State of play with female MAPs -
Hebephilia is normative
