One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Template:EGLPHP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:Schustertable.png|A comparison of various phallometric studies. | |||
File:Prevalences.png|Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles | File:Prevalences.png|Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles | ||
File:PedoPrevalence.jpg|Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common | File:PedoPrevalence.jpg|Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common | ||
Revision as of 09:29, 12 January 2022
-
A comparison of various phallometric studies. -
Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles
-
Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common -
(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports -
Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia) -
Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd) -
Barbaree and Marshall - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response
-
Hebephilia is universal -
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
