Template:EGLPHC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:PoliticalPsychiatry.jpg|A warning about the political nature of Psychiatry | File:PoliticalPsychiatry.jpg|A warning about the political nature of Psychiatry | ||
File:MoserKleinpatz2020.jpg|Moser and Kleinpatz - Paraphilia is a questionable concept | |||
File:DSM5.png|Americal Psychiatric Assiciation's DSM-5 Manual says pedophilia can be an orientation | File:DSM5.png|Americal Psychiatric Assiciation's DSM-5 Manual says pedophilia can be an orientation | ||
File:CharlesMoserPedoDisorder.jpg|Charles Moser on the subsequent coverage and bumbling by the APA | File:CharlesMoserPedoDisorder.jpg|Charles Moser on the subsequent coverage and bumbling by the APA |
Revision as of 22:30, 12 January 2022
-
A warning about the political nature of Psychiatry
-
Moser and Kleinpatz - Paraphilia is a questionable concept
-
Americal Psychiatric Assiciation's DSM-5 Manual says pedophilia can be an orientation
-
Charles Moser on the subsequent coverage and bumbling by the APA
-
DSM-5 another graphic
-
Some chronophilias
-
Mirkin on methodological flaws and gay analogy
-
Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence?
-
Sociocultural perspective on pedophilia as a disorder - Chenier
-
Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths
-
Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth
-
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
-
The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles
-
Lievesley/Lapworth 2021 - State of play with female MAPs
-
Hebephilia is normative
-
Rind and Yuill on adaptive hebephilia
-
Rind and Yuill (cont'd)
-
Rind and Yuill (cont'd)
-
Rind and Yuill (cont'd)