CSA Accommodation Syndrome: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[[Child Sexual Abuse]] Accommodation Syndrome''' (CSAAS) is a fabricated and widely discredited "disorder" used by [[Victimology|victimologists]] to reinterpret a variety of child testimony (disclosure, non-disclosure, sustained denial, retraction) as evidence of CSA.<ref>[De Young, Mary (2004). The day care ritual abuse moral panic. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-1830-5.]</ref> It was a critical propaganda tool in the [[Wikipedia:Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria|Day-care hysteria]] of the 1980s and 90s, and was first proposed by [[Roland Summit]] - a pioneer in victimological literature, in 1983.
'''[[Child Sexual Abuse]] Accommodation Syndrome''' (CSAAS) is a fabricated and widely discredited "disorder" used by [[Victimology|victimologists]] to reinterpret a variety of child testimony (disclosure, non-disclosure, sustained denial, retraction) as evidence of CSA.<ref>De Young, Mary (2004). The day care ritual abuse moral panic. Jefferson, N.C: McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-1830-5.</ref> It was a critical propaganda tool in the [[Wikipedia:Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria|Day-care hysteria]] of the 1980s and 90s, and was first proposed by [[Roland Summit]] - a pioneer in victimological literature, in 1983.


==Proposed mechanism==
==Proposed mechanism==
Line 18: Line 18:


Several states have prohibited testimony regarding CSAAS, based on evidence that it is not accepted generally by scientists, except for delayed reporting.<ref>State v. J.L.G., Docket Number A-50-16(N.J. Sup. Ct. July 31, 2018). See also State v. Ballard, 855 S.W.2d 557, 562 (Tenn. Sup. Ct. 1993); Hadden v. State, 690 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Sup. Ct. 1997)</ref> Summit himself has subsequently identified that the concept has been abused for scientific and legal reasons,<ref>R. v. K (A.), (1999), 1999 CanLII 3793 (ON CA), 45 O.R. (3d) 641 (C.A.) at paras. 125</ref> and  neither the American Psychiatric Association nor the American Psychological Association has recognized CSAAS.
Several states have prohibited testimony regarding CSAAS, based on evidence that it is not accepted generally by scientists, except for delayed reporting.<ref>State v. J.L.G., Docket Number A-50-16(N.J. Sup. Ct. July 31, 2018). See also State v. Ballard, 855 S.W.2d 557, 562 (Tenn. Sup. Ct. 1993); Hadden v. State, 690 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Sup. Ct. 1997)</ref> Summit himself has subsequently identified that the concept has been abused for scientific and legal reasons,<ref>R. v. K (A.), (1999), 1999 CanLII 3793 (ON CA), 45 O.R. (3d) 641 (C.A.) at paras. 125</ref> and  neither the American Psychiatric Association nor the American Psychological Association has recognized CSAAS.


==References==
==References==


[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Child Advocacy]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:History & Events: American]][[Category:History & Events: 1980s]][[Category:Mental Health Industry]]
[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]][[Category:Child Advocacy]][[Category:Hysteria]][[Category:Terminology]][[Category:Terminology: Academic]][[Category:Research]][[Category:Research into effects on Children]][[Category:Research: Victimology and other Pseudoscience]][[Category:History & Events: American]][[Category:History & Events: 1980s]][[Category:Mental Health Industry]]

Revision as of 10:43, 18 August 2023

Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS) is a fabricated and widely discredited "disorder" used by victimologists to reinterpret a variety of child testimony (disclosure, non-disclosure, sustained denial, retraction) as evidence of CSA.[1] It was a critical propaganda tool in the Day-care hysteria of the 1980s and 90s, and was first proposed by Roland Summit - a pioneer in victimological literature, in 1983.

Proposed mechanism

Summit believed children "learn to accept the situation and to survive", fostering the shamed secrecy thought to typify CSA at the time. "There is no way out, no place to run", he adds; "the healthy, normal emotionally resilient child will learn to accommodate to the reality of continuing sexual abuse."[2]

He posited five stages through which the child attempts to cope with this:

  1. Secrecy
  2. Helplessness
  3. Entrapment and accommodation
  4. Delayed disclosure
  5. Retraction

Discredit

CSAAS belongs to a long list of false diagnostic tools related to the CSA panics of the 1980s and 90s - often resulting in absurd statements by professionals. Similar fallacious circulars have been used in setting up professional discourses on "cognitive distortion", for example. Practitioners and theorists continue to blame "lack of awareness", or "flawed cultural beliefs" for the prevalence of sexual behaviors they deem to be aberrant.[3]

Several states have prohibited testimony regarding CSAAS, based on evidence that it is not accepted generally by scientists, except for delayed reporting.[4] Summit himself has subsequently identified that the concept has been abused for scientific and legal reasons,[5] and neither the American Psychiatric Association nor the American Psychological Association has recognized CSAAS.

References