23 Sep, 2024: Our collection of material documenting harassment, doxing and allegations of illegal behavior against MAPs, on the part of a purportedly "MAP" group, is now complete. A second article documenting a campaign of disinformation by said group is nearing completion, and will be shared here.
Debate Guide: Cyclical paternalism: Difference between revisions
The Admins (talk | contribs) improve |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This argument is in effect the reverse of the [[Debate Guide: Liberty-empowerment|liberty empowerment]] theory and is used to describe how paternalist/protectionist/parentalist/ageist practises in society will sometimes fulfil their supporters' prophecies that such measures will be required. | |||
This argument (in relation to the concept of [[consent]]) is summed up by [http://www.mhamic.org/sources/li1.htm Chin-Keung Li] on the MHAMic website: | |||
[[Image:Li.gif]] | [[Image:Li.gif]] | ||
Some anti-drugs laws that aim to protect people from harmful substances have made the use of virtually harmless substances potentially deadly through poor production standards and lack of appropriate education. Similarly, attempting to protect a class of people from natural, human sexuality leads to inadequate education and hands control of these practises to a hidden, criminal element. Therefore, protectionist actions may be excused by the unthinking because they allegedly "prevent" and "bring closure to" the problems they are in part responsible for causing. | |||
To resolve this issue, young people should be handed back control of their bodies and taught not to feel guilty about their sexuality. | |||
[[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Child/Minor]] | [[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Child/Minor]] | ||
Revision as of 21:41, 21 March 2009
This argument is in effect the reverse of the liberty empowerment theory and is used to describe how paternalist/protectionist/parentalist/ageist practises in society will sometimes fulfil their supporters' prophecies that such measures will be required.
This argument (in relation to the concept of consent) is summed up by Chin-Keung Li on the MHAMic website:
Some anti-drugs laws that aim to protect people from harmful substances have made the use of virtually harmless substances potentially deadly through poor production standards and lack of appropriate education. Similarly, attempting to protect a class of people from natural, human sexuality leads to inadequate education and hands control of these practises to a hidden, criminal element. Therefore, protectionist actions may be excused by the unthinking because they allegedly "prevent" and "bring closure to" the problems they are in part responsible for causing.
To resolve this issue, young people should be handed back control of their bodies and taught not to feel guilty about their sexuality.