Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about children and minors: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rez (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
remove nonsense article alter name of another
Line 4: Line 4:
*[[Debate Guide: Cyclical paternalism|Cyclical paternalism]] - Protecting children brings about the need to protect them more.
*[[Debate Guide: Cyclical paternalism|Cyclical paternalism]] - Protecting children brings about the need to protect them more.
*[[Debate Guide: Prior experience|Prior experience]] - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience.
*[[Debate Guide: Prior experience|Prior experience]] - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience.
*[[Debate Guide: The fallacy of "sexual maturity"|The fallacy of "sexual maturity"]] - The concept, as used in child advocacy is fatally flawed.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Cognitive ability|Cognitive ability = consent?]] - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Cognitive ability|Cognitive ability]] - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Childhood innocence|Childhood innocence]] - Childhood innocence is ''not'' a state of asexuality that can be "stolen".
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Childhood innocence|Childhood innocence]] - Childhood innocence is ''not'' a state of asexuality that can be "stolen".



Revision as of 19:40, 21 September 2021

Sex, children and minors are not incompatible...

Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...

Child advocacy is often illogical...

  • Against: The kids do not want it - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
  • Against: Teen brain - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.

From the encyclopedia...