One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.

Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about adult-minor relationships: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Jim Burton (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Child sexualisation and objectification|Sexualisation and objectification]] - Sex/physical relationships needn't be all-consuming.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Child sexualisation and objectification|Sexualisation and objectification]] - Sex/physical relationships needn't be all-consuming.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Sexual inexperience|Sexual inexperience]] - When is supposedly the "best time" to gain life experience?
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Sexual inexperience|Sexual inexperience]] - When is supposedly the "best time" to gain life experience?
*''Against'': [[Debate Guide:Teacher-Student Sex|Teacher/student sex]] - The contention these relations are always ethically wrong.


[[File:Gnhgdfsgrfrs.png|150px|link=|frameless|right]]
[[File:Gnhgdfsgrfrs.png|150px|link=|frameless|right]]

Revision as of 15:50, 13 April 2025

Age of Consent laws are a blunt instrument...

  • Against: Legal pragmatism - It is wrongly argued that high Ages of Consent are "pragmatic".

Myths and bad meta-ethics plague discussions of expressed adult-minor sexuality...

Levels of harm are exaggerated and the sources are completely misunderstood...

Other societies and species are points of interest...

Many people also speak from direct experience...