One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Debate Guide: Difference between revisions
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
*[[The Professional Victim]] | *[[The Professional Victim]] | ||
*[[The nature of Human Attraction]] | *[[The nature of Human Attraction]] - Why humans have a ''capacity'' for diverse taste. | ||
*'''Against:''' [[Example Assertive]] | *'''Against:''' [[Example Assertive]] | ||
Revision as of 15:57, 27 April 2008
Debate Guide is a growing list of arguments and counter arguments for the sexual emancipation of minors and minor attracted adults.
It also functions as centre for advice, links and external debate resources pertaining to these issues and the age of consent.
Introduction
General Advisory
Arguments: Assertive and Defensive
"Minor" Arguments
- Against: Example Assertive
"Adult" Arguments
- Against: Example Assertive
"Minor-Attraction" Arguments
- Against: Example Assertive
Sociological Arguments
This includes manipulations of the biological.
- The Professional Victim
- The nature of Human Attraction - Why humans have a capacity for diverse taste.
- Against: Example Assertive
Debate Resources
A collection of scientific research and other demonstrative references on matters relevant to minor sexuality.
Links that have some relevance to debating the issues contained within the guide.
Applicable forums and some examples of debates on the issues covered.
About the Guide
- Also see Recent Changes