Talk:Special Article: Adverse effects of hysteria: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Australian_Government_censorship_of_US_anti-abortion_site_abortiontv.com%2C_21_Jan_2009 | http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Australian_Government_censorship_of_US_anti-abortion_site_abortiontv.com%2C_21_Jan_2009 | ||
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Australian_government_secret_ACMA_internet_censorship_blacklist%2C_6_Aug_2008 [[User:The Admins|The Admins]] 02:26, 20 March 2009 (UTC) | http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Australian_government_secret_ACMA_internet_censorship_blacklist%2C_6_Aug_2008 | ||
http://libertus.net/censor/ispfiltering-au-govplan.html#s_52 [[User:The Admins|The Admins]] 02:26, 20 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:32, 20 March 2009
I'm not an american law expert, but I undertand that entrapment (http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9899151-38.html?tag=nefd.lede) is a subset of unconstitutionality. Rez (The Administrators - anonym) 22:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
CensorMania
Sources on ISP-level web censorship lists gone wrong.
http://maraz.kapsi.fi/sisalto-en.html
http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/
http://libertus.net/censor/ispfiltering-au-govplan.html#s_52 The Admins 02:26, 20 March 2009 (UTC)