User talk:Jillium: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Replacing page with 'Archives: 2009 to 2011 ==Yo== You're a crat, gonna edit anymore? ~~~~' |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Yo== | ==Yo== | ||
You're a crat, gonna edit anymore? [[User:Tyciol|Ty]] 19:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | You're a crat, gonna edit anymore? [[User:Tyciol|Ty]] 19:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
==What is your opinion?== | |||
It appeared to become unfeasible (and has been throughout your absence) to maintain an encyclopedia and frequent updates on the Wiki. I propose to refocus on content that maintains its value throughout time - that is any content built upon research quotations as a foundation, testimony, guides and archive material that isn't outdated or historically important. The question is then whether to retain it within a restructured Wiki or move it to a new-look, streamlined CMS (Wordpress?) and archive the Wiki with all of its inactive projects. [[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 17:43, 7 October 2013 (CEST) |
Revision as of 15:43, 7 October 2013
Archives: 2009 to 2011
Yo
You're a crat, gonna edit anymore? Ty 19:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
What is your opinion?
It appeared to become unfeasible (and has been throughout your absence) to maintain an encyclopedia and frequent updates on the Wiki. I propose to refocus on content that maintains its value throughout time - that is any content built upon research quotations as a foundation, testimony, guides and archive material that isn't outdated or historically important. The question is then whether to retain it within a restructured Wiki or move it to a new-look, streamlined CMS (Wordpress?) and archive the Wiki with all of its inactive projects. The Admins (talk) 17:43, 7 October 2013 (CEST)