One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Template:Debate Guide:Other arguments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Other arguments don't relate ''fundamentally'' to attractions, minors or relationships...''' | |||
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Your arguments must be self-serving|Your arguments must be self-serving]] - Emotional, accusative and fallacious argument. | *''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Your arguments must be self-serving|Your arguments must be self-serving]] - Emotional, accusative and fallacious argument. | ||
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: All good parents would know|All good parents would know]] - Some wrongly argue that only parents are qualified to make | *''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: All good parents would know|All good parents would know]] - Some wrongly argue that only parents are qualified to make judgments. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Child abuse industry|Child abuse industry]] - Child sexual abuse has an "industrial complex" all of its own. | *[[Debate Guide: Child abuse industry|Child abuse industry]] - Child sexual abuse has an "industrial complex" all of its own. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: The professional victim|The professional victim]] - The sexual abuse discourse perpetuates itself via well-meaning victims. | *[[Debate Guide: The professional victim|The professional victim]] - The sexual abuse discourse perpetuates itself via well-meaning victims. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Abuse of language|Abuse of language]] - Language is misused and redefined to suit nefarious purposes. | *[[Debate Guide: Abuse of language|Abuse of language]] - Language is misused and redefined to suit nefarious purposes. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Blame game|Blame game]] - How societies and individuals look for easy scapegoats. | *[[Debate Guide: Blame game|Blame game]] - How societies and individuals look for easy scapegoats. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Short arguments|Short arguments]] - A large number of smaller | |||
'''Debate Guide is a work in progress, and some material is undeveloped...''' | |||
*[[Debate Guide: Short arguments|Short arguments]] - A large number of smaller arguments for use in debates. | |||
'''From the encyclopedia...''' | '''From the encyclopedia...''' | ||
Revision as of 07:00, 14 October 2021
Other arguments don't relate fundamentally to attractions, minors or relationships...
- Against: Your arguments must be self-serving - Emotional, accusative and fallacious argument.
- Against: All good parents would know - Some wrongly argue that only parents are qualified to make judgments.
- Child abuse industry - Child sexual abuse has an "industrial complex" all of its own.
- The professional victim - The sexual abuse discourse perpetuates itself via well-meaning victims.
- The hypocritical establishment - Why concerns about child abuse may be disingenuous.
- Sexual repression as a tool of the state - It is in the interest of authoritarian states to persecute sexuality.
- Abuse of language - Language is misused and redefined to suit nefarious purposes.
- Blame game - How societies and individuals look for easy scapegoats.
Debate Guide is a work in progress, and some material is undeveloped...
- Short arguments - A large number of smaller arguments for use in debates.
From the encyclopedia...
- Hysterical reactions have many adverse effects
- SOR problems - Registries for sexual offenders are unfair and counteractive.
- Child pornography is much misunderstood, and is most certainly not a multibillion dollar industry (research).