One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.

Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about children and minors: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
'''Child advocacy is often illogical...'''
'''Child advocacy is often illogical...'''


*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Legal minors must supposedly "embrace" or "consent to" law reforms.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Teen brain|Teen brain]] - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Teen brain|Teen brain]] - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Corresponding age attraction|Corresponding age attraction]] - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Corresponding age attraction|Corresponding age attraction]] - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.

Revision as of 06:55, 14 October 2021

People under the age of majority can be sexual...

Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...

Child advocacy is often illogical...

  • Against: The kids do not want it - Legal minors must supposedly "embrace" or "consent to" law reforms.
  • Against: Teen brain - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
  • Against: Corresponding age attraction - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.

From the encyclopedia...