Nelson Maatman: Difference between revisions
m →2021 Prosecution: Ref |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Nelson Maatman''' is a young, second-wave [[Minor Attracted Person|MAP]] activist from the Netherlands, and chair of the [[PNVD]]. | '''Nelson Maatman''' is a young, second-wave [[Minor Attracted Person|MAP]] activist from the Netherlands, and chair of the [[PNVD]]. | ||
He is currently under investigation for supposed links with the banned political organization, [[Vereniging MARTIJN]], which ceased operation before he became active as a campaigner. He has been known to have left the country at some point, and this has been characterized as "fleeing" the country. | He is currently under investigation for supposed links with the banned political organization, [[Vereniging MARTIJN]], which ceased operation before he became active as a campaigner. He has been known to have left the country at some point, and this has been characterized as "fleeing" the country. In 2022, it was revealed that he was seeking asylum in Mexico, following his trial in the Netherlands.<ref>[https://www.freespeechtube.org/user/Nelson Nelson: FST]</ref> | ||
Maatman has become infamous after seeking to make an appearance at Amsterdam’s annual Pride march in the summer of 2019. He devised a social experiment whereby he attempted to [[Historical examples of LGBT-MAP unity|bring back the tradition]] of advocating for children’s and paedophiles’ rights at Pride events. He was barred, and has since appealed to human rights organizations. He has also taken part in an infamous television interview, in which he made provocative statements about sexual relationships between adults and minors.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBC5X8l4uOU YouTube (Dutch)] and [https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/16bl English Translation]</ref> He was soon-after arrested under statutes on illegal images, but no evidence has thusfar been indicated. | Maatman has become infamous after seeking to make an appearance at Amsterdam’s annual Pride march in the summer of 2019. He devised a social experiment whereby he attempted to [[Historical examples of LGBT-MAP unity|bring back the tradition]] of advocating for children’s and paedophiles’ rights at Pride events. He was barred, and has since appealed to human rights organizations. He has also taken part in an infamous television interview, in which he made provocative statements about sexual relationships between adults and minors.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBC5X8l4uOU YouTube (Dutch)] and [https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/16bl English Translation]</ref> He was soon-after arrested under statutes on illegal images, but no evidence has thusfar been indicated. | ||
Revision as of 11:56, 23 February 2022
Nelson Maatman is a young, second-wave MAP activist from the Netherlands, and chair of the PNVD.
He is currently under investigation for supposed links with the banned political organization, Vereniging MARTIJN, which ceased operation before he became active as a campaigner. He has been known to have left the country at some point, and this has been characterized as "fleeing" the country. In 2022, it was revealed that he was seeking asylum in Mexico, following his trial in the Netherlands.[1]
Maatman has become infamous after seeking to make an appearance at Amsterdam’s annual Pride march in the summer of 2019. He devised a social experiment whereby he attempted to bring back the tradition of advocating for children’s and paedophiles’ rights at Pride events. He was barred, and has since appealed to human rights organizations. He has also taken part in an infamous television interview, in which he made provocative statements about sexual relationships between adults and minors.[2] He was soon-after arrested under statutes on illegal images, but no evidence has thusfar been indicated.
2021 Prosecution
In March 2021, Marthijn Uittenbogaard announced that he, Maatman, Norbert de Jonge and Ad van den Berg were being prosecuted for allegedly participating in a criminal organisation. The evidence offered by the prosecution is spurious, alleging that Twitter comments and the maintenance of an academic website constitute the continuation of an organisation deemed 'criminal' under a highly controversial Dutch law.[3]
External Links
- Tom O'Carroll - With some information in English - source used in this article.