One of our staff members is contributing considerably to a News Archiving service at Mu. Any well educated (Masters, PhD or above) users who wish to make comments on news sites, please contact Jim Burton directly rather than using this list, and we can work on maximising view count.
Template:EGLPHC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
File:Pedodisorder.png|DSM-5 another graphic | File:Pedodisorder.png|DSM-5 another graphic | ||
File:MDEdge.png|Some chronophilias | File:MDEdge.png|Some chronophilias | ||
File:MirkinHomosexualMethodology.jpg|Mirkin on methodological flaws and Gay Analogy | |||
File:PedoAsOrientation.png|Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence? | File:PedoAsOrientation.png|Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence? | ||
File:Devped.png|Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths | File:Devped.png|Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths | ||
Revision as of 00:40, 31 December 2021
-
Americal Psychiatric Assiciation's DSM-5 Manual says pedophilia can be an orientation -
Charles Moser on the subsequent coverage and bumbling by the APA -
DSM-5 another graphic -
Some chronophilias -
Mirkin on methodological flaws and Gay Analogy -
Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence? -
Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths -
Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth -
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control -
The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles -
Lievesley/Lapworth 2021 - State of play with female MAPs -
Hebephilia is normative -
Rind and Yuill on adaptive hebephilia
