Template:EGLPHP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:Schustertable.png|A comparison of various phallometric studies. | |||
File:Prevalences.png|Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles | File:Prevalences.png|Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles | ||
File:PedoPrevalence.jpg|Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common | File:PedoPrevalence.jpg|Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common | ||
Revision as of 09:29, 12 January 2022
-
A comparison of various phallometric studies. -
Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles
-
Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common -
(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports -
Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia) -
Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd) -
Barbaree and Marshall - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response
-
Hebephilia is universal -
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
