Template:EGLPHP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is universal | File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is universal | ||
File:Searches.jpg|Search results suggest hebephilia is common | File:Searches.jpg|Search results suggest hebephilia is common | ||
File:FirstMarriageBinfordDataset2001.jpg|...as do historical marriage | File:FirstMarriageBinfordDataset2001.jpg|...as do historical marriage trends | ||
File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 10:08, 12 January 2022
-
A comparison of various phallometric studies -
Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles
-
Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common -
(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports -
Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia) -
Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd) -
Barbaree and Marshall - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response
-
Hebephilia is universal -
Search results suggest hebephilia is common -
...as do historical marriage trends -
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
