Template:EGLPHP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
File:Searches.jpg|Search results suggest hebephilia is common | File:Searches.jpg|Search results suggest hebephilia is common | ||
File:FirstMarriageBinfordDataset2001.jpg|...as do historical marriage trends | File:FirstMarriageBinfordDataset2001.jpg|...as do historical marriage trends | ||
File:FHyyjPYX0AQBzwG.png|Example RV curve | |||
File:FHyylMWX0Agjj-e.jpg|Preference for neotenic features is common | |||
File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> |
Revision as of 22:28, 12 January 2022
-
A comparison of various phallometric studies
-
Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles
-
Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common
-
(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports
-
Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia)
-
Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd)
-
Barbaree and Marshall - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response
-
Hebephilia is universal (see characteristics and the associated article for more excerpts)
-
Search results suggest hebephilia is common
-
...as do historical marriage trends
-
Example RV curve
-
Preference for neotenic features is common
-
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control