Template:EGLHarm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
File:Lesbians.png|Simpler way of expressing Lesbian outcomes (ref to modern feminism) | File:Lesbians.png|Simpler way of expressing Lesbian outcomes (ref to modern feminism) | ||
File:Adultadult2.png|Further distillation of Rind's Kinsey analysis | File:Adultadult2.png|Further distillation of Rind's Kinsey analysis | ||
File:Rindbasic.jpeg|Finnish Victimization Survey | |||
File:Innocence.jpg|General reading on intrinsic harm | File:Innocence.jpg|General reading on intrinsic harm | ||
File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny1(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm | File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny1(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm |
Revision as of 11:15, 16 February 2022
-
Basic Rind Paradox infographic
-
Summarized Rind findings
-
Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm
-
Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in The Guardian
-
What victimologists say about youth perception + admissions of iatrogenic harm
-
Self-perception: Importance
-
Some reading on secondary harm and perception/situational variables
-
More secondary harms
-
Intrinsic vs secondary harm
-
Daly's 2021 repetition of Rind (1998), finds that self-perception is far more important that abuse status
-
Lahtinen Report: Most common reason for not reporting - event not serious enough
-
College outcomes: Benefits of college samples
-
LGBT outcome/perception data (links to papers in this release)
-
Simpler way of expressing Lesbian outcomes (ref to modern feminism)
-
Further distillation of Rind's Kinsey analysis
-
Finnish Victimization Survey
-
General reading on intrinsic harm
-
The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm
-
The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm
-
CSA harm was known to be confounded even before Rind
-
No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome"
-
Rind on methodological issues/limitations of victimology
-
The Lanning (1992) report - full of hysterical conjecture, nevertheless describes the "most common" forms of offender and victim in banal terms that are applicable to most relationships (in order to prepare investigators to pathologize banality)
-
Percy Foundation review of Chloe Taylor: "Foucault, Feminism, & Sex Crimes"