23 Sep, 2024: Our collection of material documenting harassment, doxing and allegations of illegal behavior against MAPs, on the part of a purportedly "MAP" group, is now complete. A second article documenting a campaign of disinformation by said group is nearing completion, and will be shared here.
Template:EGLConsent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
File:Aboutsandfortconsentoutcomes.jpg|Review of Sandfort and consent | File:Aboutsandfortconsentoutcomes.jpg|Review of Sandfort and consent | ||
File:DeOrioConsent.png|De Orio on Queer Identities that don't fit the model of consent | File:DeOrioConsent.png|De Orio on Queer Identities that don't fit the model of consent | ||
File:Levinereview2.png|Review of [[Judith Levine]]'s work: Consent dogma | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 5 May 2022
-
Bruce Rind on CSA concept (in)validity -
Rind on lack of predictive validity for informed consent/CSA concept invalidity -
Rind - CSA concept invalidity continued -
David Finkelhor (Abuse Guru) and his failed moral circular argument -
Terry Leahy: Absence of an ethical argument against age-gap sex -
Paul Okami on Power Imbalance argument (from Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002)) -
Review of Sandfort and consent -
De Orio on Queer Identities that don't fit the model of consent -
Review of Judith Levine's work: Consent dogma
